We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 15

J Varney & Sons Ltd v Hertfordshire County Council

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On 21 June 2011 the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by J Varney & Sons against a ruling of the High Court that rejected its action for damages against Hertfordshire County Council for alleged breaches of the Public Contracts Regulations 2006

Key changes in the NHS: what does this mean for procurement?

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 18 2013

The changes to the NHS brought about by the coalition government are comprehensive with perhaps the most fundamental transformation being the

Cabinet Office announces new government procurement team and publishes departmental SME action plans

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On 3 June 2011 the Cabinet Office announced further measures to make government procurement more efficient and to open it up to small businesses

Mears Limited v Leeds City Council

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On 19 April 2011 the High Court handed down a judgment finding that Leeds City Council had breached the public procurement rules in a tender for improvement and refurbishment works for social housing

R (on the application of Hoole & Co) v Legal Services Commission

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On 15 April 2011 the High Court dismissed an application for judicial review of the e-tendering procedure used by the Legal Services Commission

All About Rights Law Practice, R (on the application of) v Legal Services Commission

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On 14 April 2011 the High Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) to reject a tender and to refuse to allow the tenderer to provide missing information

The Public Procurement (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On 17 August the Public Procurement (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 20112 were published alongside a document summarising the responses to the consultation on how to implement the fallout from Uniplex v NHS Business Services Authority (which concerned time limits in procurement cases, and in which the court held that the UK rules on time limits for bringing proceedings did not accord with EU law

What was the fuss over the Remedies Directive about?

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

It is now more than 18 months since the Public Contract (Amendment) Regulations (SI 20092992), which implemented the 2007 Remedies Directive (200766EC), came into effect

The Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On 2 August 2011 the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 (SI 20111848) were published

R (on the application of Harrow Solicitors and Advocates) v The Legal Services Commission

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 22 2011

On 28 April 2011 the High Court has dismissed an application by an unsuccessful tenderer for review of a decision by a contracting authority not to allow the tenderer to correct a genuine mistake in the tender documents submitted