We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 172

Notice provisions

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 4 2014

One of the many cases Mr Justice Ramsey had to consider was whether or not Mercon had failed to comply with the notice requirements in clause 14 in

PFI agreements and practical completion

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 4 2014

The proceedings here arose out of the construction of facilities at two hospitals in Newcastle. The project was undertaken under a PFI scheme under

Arbitration: was there a binding agreement to arbitrate?

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 13 2014

Clause 11 of the contract between the parties provided the following procedure for resolving disputes:“In case of any dispute or claim arising out of

Public procurement: the “normal average tenderer”

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 13 2014

Typically in a procurement challenge, a court has to determine whether the invitation to tender is sufficiently clear to enable tenderers to

Adjudication: breaches of natural justice

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 13 2014

Bouygues sought to challenge an adjudicator’s decision that they should pay some £1.6 million to Vital. They raised a number of familiar arguments

Case update: certificates

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 13 2014

We first reported on this case in Issue 156. Optima were the developers for a residential block. S&P were architects in contract with Optima who had

Martrade Shipping v United Enterprises

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 2 2014

To what extent does the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 apply to international contracts? The legislation is afterall based on

Stagecoach South Western Trains v Hind & Anr

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 2 2014

Stagecoach sought damages following a collision between a train and the stem of an Ash tree which had fallen onto the railway line from the garden of

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Condek Holdings Ltd & Others

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 2 2014

The dispute here related to the design and construction of a car park in North Cheam. Two of the Defendants successfully brought applications to

Kruppa v Benedetti & Anr

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 2 2014

Benedetti made an application to stay proceedings brought by Kruppa pursuant to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The main question for Mr