We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

The relevance of EPO decisions to Singapore

  • ATMD Bird & Bird LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Singapore
  • -
  • October 26 2012

Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd (Main-Line) is the owner of a patented method and system registered in Singapore on 30 June 2003, that automatically determines the operating currency in which to process a transaction for a credit card, charge card or debit card at the point of sale between a merchant and the cardholder, without the need for any manual selection or intervention by the merchant andor the cardholder to identify the card’s currency (the Patent

Singapore High Court revokes patent for taxi rooftop display

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • May 31 2011

In the case of Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (trading as Soon Heng Digitax) 2011 SGHC 36, the Plaintiff imported and supplied systems for displaying messages on panels of multicoloured LEDS mounted on the rooftop of taxis

Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill International Trading PTE Ltd 2010 SGCA 51

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • January 28 2011

On 28 December 2010, the Singapore Court of Appeal granted judgement in favour of Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd ("Cargill") against Martek Biosciences Corp ("Martek"), dismissing Martek's application for leave to adduce further evidence in relation to a pending action in the High Court