We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Paperless discovery

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • September 30 2010

The Supreme Court of Singapore Practice Direction No. 3 of 2009 (“PD32009”) provides an opt-in protocol (the “Protocol”) for electronically stored documents (“ESD”) to be inspected and provided in their native format

Plea of mistake succeeds in the District Court

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • August 19 2010

In the recent case of Public Prosecutor v Chua Keng Fock 2010 SGDC 134, the District Court acquitted the Accused of charges brought under the Trade Marks Act (Cap. 332) on the ground that he had taken all reasonable precautions against committing the offence, and had no reason to suspect the genuineness of the goods

Valentino Globe loses in court of appeal

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • July 8 2010

In the recent decision of Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc 2010 SGCA 14, the Singapore Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the High Court in rejecting Valentino Globe BV's (the "Appellant") opposition to Pacific Rim Industries' (the "Respondent") application for the registration of its "Emilio Valentino & V Device" mark in Class 18