We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 26

Industrial engineering sector e-briefing: national ban on incentives finally abolished

  • Eversheds LLP
  • -
  • Austria
  • -
  • March 20 2013

The Austrian Art Against Unfair Competition provided for a strict ban on incentives in both Business-to-Consumer (B2C) and Business-to-Business (B2B

Advocate General’s opinion on imposing a fine for breach of Article 101 TFEU when an undertaking believed it was acting lawfully

  • Roschier
  • -
  • Austria, European Union
  • -
  • March 6 2013

Advocate General Kokott ("AG") handed down an opinion on a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Austrian Cartel Court of Appeal on whether a

Amendments to Austrian competition law

  • Schoenherr
  • -
  • Austria
  • -
  • February 14 2013

In December 2012, the Austrian Parliament adopted changes to the Austrian Cartel Act as well as the Austrian Competition Act that will enter into

Advocate General's opinion regarding application of principle of effectiveness to access to documents in damages action

  • Roschier
  • -
  • Austria, European Union
  • -
  • February 13 2013

Advocate General Jääskinen ("AG") gave an opinion on a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Austrian Cartel Court on whether a

The international comparative legal guide to: merger control 2013 - Austria

  • Schoenherr
  • -
  • Austria
  • -
  • December 10 2012

The relevant merger authorities in Austria are the Federal Competition Authority (Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde “FCA”), an independent administrative body assigned to the Federal Minister of Economics and Labour, the Federal Cartel Prosecutor (Bundeskartellanwalt “FCP”, together with the FCA referred to as the “Official Parties”), who is assigned to the Federal Minister of Justice, and the Cartel Court (Kartellgericht

The international comparative legal guide to: merger control 2013 - Slovakia

  • Schoenherr
  • -
  • Austria, Slovakia
  • -
  • November 1 2012

The relevant merger authority in Slovakia is the Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic (Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky) with its seat in Bratislava (the “Office”

Global guide to competition litigation

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • October 1 2012

Competition litigation is a fast growing and complex area of commercial litigation that often requires coordination of strategy across jurisdictions

Austrian data collection authority does not qualify as an undertaking

  • Stibbe
  • -
  • Austria, European Union
  • -
  • August 2 2012

On 12 July 2012, the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") handed down an interesting ruling (Case C-13811) on the question of whether a State entity that registers certain information and makes this available to the public, qualifies as an undertaking within the meaning of competition law

CMS quarterly communications update - July 2012

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • Austria, Bulgaria, European Union, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 20 2012

Quarterly update summarising regulatory and legal developments from the last three months in the communications, media and satellite sectors in Europe

Advocate General’s opinion on whether a public authority is an undertaking under Article 102

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • Austria, European Union
  • -
  • May 1 2012

On 26 April 2012, Advocate General Jääskinen handed down an opinion to the Austrian Supreme Court on whether a public authority is an “undertaking” under Article 102 of the TFEU (in relation to abuse of dominant position by an undertaking), where it stores information reported by undertakings and allows inspection to be made in return for payment, but prevents more extensive use of the information

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy