We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 273

Repeal day bill adds to regulatory burden

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 30 2015

In a surprising move, the government is using a repeal day bill to beef up the ACCC's investigative powers. If passed, amendments contained in the

ACCC v Pfizer: fuel for the fire regarding an “effects test”

  • Piper Alderman
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 27 2015

The ACCC’s loss of another case concerning section 46, the abuse of dominance provision, may well add to the pressure for the Competition Policy

Obeid v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

  • Cooper Grace Ward
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 24 2015

The Full Court of the Federal Court recently upheld the validity of compulsory examination notices issued by the ACCC to Paul and Moses Obeid, sons

Bidding for Mt Penny: s. 155 notices and alleged breaches of competition laws in bidding processes

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 19 2015

A novel attempt to set aside a section 155 notice only shows how hard it is to do so. Competition laws apply to bids for government licences issued

Australian Federal Court decides protecting your brand against generic pharmaceuticals is not a misuse of market power

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 18 2015

In a decision which will be welcomed by many pharmaceutical companies the Federal Court of Australia recently dismissed proceedings instituted by the

Protecting commercial viability not necessarily anti-competitive

  • McCabes
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 18 2015

In what has turned out to be another unsuccessful attempt by the ACCC to prosecute a misuse of market power case, the Federal Court of Australia, in

Substantial market power now you have it, now you don’t. The decision in ACCC v Pfizer

  • Johnson Winter & Slattery
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 17 2015

The recent Federal Court decision in ACCC v Pfizer serves as strong reminder that market power is not static but must be assessed in the context of a

Hird loses Federal Court administrative law appeal

  • Maddocks
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 17 2015

Justices Kenny, Besanko and White of the Federal Court have handed down their unanimous judgement dismissing James Hird's appeal in connection with

The ACCC’s enforcement agenda creates headaches

  • Gadens Lawyers
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 11 2015

Coming hot on the heels of the launch of the ACCC's 2015 Compliance and Enforcement Policy (2015 Enforcement Policy) (recently discussed here), the

Competition review: March 20151

  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 10 2015

On 10 February 2015, in proceedings brought by the ACCC, the Federal Court of Australia (Court), ordered by consent that Origin Energy Limited and