We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Yet another case of misleading and deceptive advertising this time La Ionica

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 8 2012

On 23 January 2012, the Federal Court delivered yet another judgment against a business involved in misleading and deceptive advertising

Furniture galore gets caught for misleading reduced price advertising

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • January 13 2012

On 11 January 2012, the ACCC announced that it had fined Furniture Galore $19,800 in relation to misleading conduct concerning its catalogues

Metcash in clear after ACCC appeal dismissed

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 6 2011

On 30 November, the Full Federal Court dismissed an appeal by the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) in relation to its application to prevent the acquisition by Metcash Trading Limited (Metcash) of shares in Interfrank Group Holdings Pty Ltd (Franklins) from Pick N Pay Retailers (Pty) Limited (Pick N Pay

Court approves metcash merger with franklins

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 25 2011

The Federal Court has handed down its decision in the Metcash case this morning, clearing the path for Metcash's proposed merger with Franklins by determining that it is not likely to be anticompetitive

Metcash decision to be handed down today

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 25 2011

The Federal Court will be handing down its decision in the Metcash case today

Cab company pays heavy penalty

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • November 12 2010

In a recent decision at the Federal Court, Black & White Cabs Pty Ltd (Black & White Cabs) was ordered to pay $110,000 in penalties for breach of the third line forcing prohibitions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA