We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 19

Supreme Court of Victoria considers grounds for oppressive conduct in Grego v Copeland & Ors

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 14 2011

This case concerned proceedings brought by Mr Frank Grego, a shareholder of Jimmi Dexta Pty Ltd (Jimmi Dexta), against the company's other shareholders, alleging oppressive conduct under s232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth

Federal Court of Australia considers the effect of an entire agreement clause on oral evidence in Prosperity Group International Pty Ltd v Queensland Communication Company Pty Ltd (No 3)

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 14 2011

This case concerned several contracts where Clear Telecoms (Aust) Pty Ltd, Australian Equipment Rentals Pty Ltd and Quick Fund (Australia) Pty Ltd (the Respondents) had agreed to provide telecommunications services to Prosperity Group International Pty Ltd and Worldnet Corporation Limited Pty Ltd (the Applicants

Queensland Court of Appeal construes the effect of oral and written terms on a standard loan contract in Zamia Investments Pty Ltd v Mesana Pty Ltd

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 14 2011

Zamia Investments Pty Ltd (Zamia) and Mesana Pty Ltd (Mesana) were shareholders of Mini Tankers International Pty Ltd (MTI), a holding company with shares in Mini Tankers USA Inc (MT USA) and Mini Tankers Canada Ltd (MTC

Victorian Supreme Court considers whether the cancellation of minority shares was "fair and reasonable" in Elkington v CostaExchange Ltd

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 14 2011

The plaintiff was a minority shareholder of the defendant company

High Court of Australia considers whether a court can declare an expert determination to be non-binding in Shoalhaven City Council v Firedam Civil Engineering

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 14 2011

In this case, the parties engaged an expert to resolve a dispute according to a term of their civil works contract

Supreme Court of NSW considers scope of shareholder power in In the matter of Winlyn Developments Pty Ltd

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 14 2011

In this case, 2 shareholders of Winlyn Developments Pty Ltd (Winlyn), Ms Yu Wen Cao and Mr Jinbiao Zheng, convened a general meeting of the company

Federal Court considers request for inspection of company books in Hanks v Admiralty Resources NL

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 22 2011

In this case, the plaintiff was a minority shareholder who held 0.00005 of the issued capital in Admiralty Resources NL (Admiralty

Supreme Court of NSW considers shareholders' rights upon entering into share surrender agreements in McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Ltd (No 3)

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 22 2011

This case concerns a long-running dispute between the parties which began in 2006

NSW Court of Appeal considers the contractual meaning of a "reasonable commercial endeavours" clause in Cypjayne Pty Limited v Babcock & Brown International Pty Ltd

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 19 2011

The appeal concerned a contract whereby Blue Hills Village Management (Liverpool) Pty Ltd (BHVML) had agreed to sell Allocated Places in its aged care facility to CAGCare Pty Ltd (CAGCare

Treasury releases proposed directors' liability reforms for public consultation

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 22 2012

On 27 January 2012, the Treasury released an exposure draft of the Personal Liability for Corporate Fault Reform Bill 2012