We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 113

Internet streaming of TV broadcasts: your ‘one stop shop’ update on international copyright disputes

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Many of us have the kind of social schedule which interferes with our passion for Ricky Martin and The Voice. Of course, there are a plethora of

Social media: aspects of the Australian regulatory landscape

  • Addisons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 15 2013

Facebook reported it had more than a billion monthly active users and an average of 618 million daily active users in December 2012. If it was a

ACCC’s Google fail: no result for ACCC’s Google search

  • Piper Alderman
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 22 2013

The case of Google v ACCC looks at the liability of online publishers for displaying false representations made by advertisers. Previously decided

Digital watch? Time’s up on misleading behaviour online

  • Piper Alderman
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 19 2013

So you know that lots of people are online, tweeting, blogging and vlogging hoping to go viral. You've been told that your business should launch a

A lesson in sharing: Google’s new AdWords policy

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 15 2013

Imagine you are a well-known multinational company. You've worked long and hard to establish yourself as a market leader. You've taken advice from

Avoid social media folly: Seafolly v Madden case study and our top tips

  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 5 2013

What happens when a company vents their frustration about a competitor on Facebook? How does the law respond? Lessons from Seafolly v Madden. Click

High Court finds Google not liable for misleading or engaging in deceptive conduct for displaying sponsored links

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 3 2013

On 6 February 2013, Australia's High Court reversed the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia which found that Google engaged

Think before you type: designer found liable for social media comments

  • Piper Alderman
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 2 2013

The Federal Court of Australia recently found that comments made on Facebook by an Australian swimwear designer about a rival swimwear label amounted

Search engine not liable for misleading or deceptive sponsored links

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 19 2013

Sponsored links appear alongside your search results and are intended to suggest products or services that will interest you, but which more often

Google reversed just a conduit after all

  • Bartier Perry
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 15 2013

Last year, we reported that the Full Federal Court had found that Google had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by the publishing of