We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 66

Seven Network v Mel B brings some spice to the principles of formation and discharge of contracts

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 9 2013

The Supreme Court of NSW recently applied the principles of formation and discharge of contracts in the case of Seven Network (Operations) Limited v

Australian corporate regulators remain wary of social media

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 11 2013

In recent times, Australia's corporate regulators have demonstrated growing concern about the rise of social media and the impact it has on the

Making advertising comply with the Australian Consumer Law: Court finds answers in TPG's fine print

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 11 2013

It is the overall impact of an advertisement and not just the dominant message which must be considered when determining if an ordinary consumer

Big loss for commissioner in the first promoter penalties case - Commissioner of Taxation v Ludekens

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 14 2013

Although the promoter penalty laws have existed since 2006, the first case has only just happened - and it wasn't good news for the Commissioner of

Court changes its tune on internet-streamed radio

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 5 2013

Copyright owners will be able to claim a separate royalty for their songs played in a radio program that is simulcast over the internet, following a

Secured creditors scheme to get Channel Nine deal approved

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 28 2013

Justice Jacobson's unwillingness to depart from the interests of the majority in relation to Nine Entertainment should give parties confidence that

Court torpedos pleading injurious falsehood as device to obtain injunction in defamation cases

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 14 2013

It seems to be increasingly fashionable to plead injurious falsehood in addition to, or in lieu of, defamation, possibly because an injunction may be

No hits in High Court search for Google liability for its advertisers' representations

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 6 2013

Google's publication of misleading advertisements by its AdWords customers did not mean that Google itself had breached section 52 of the Trade

What's on your mind? Write a comment - but check your facts before you post

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 20 2012

Ensure the accuracy of statements and comments made on social media, including statements that could be considered to be statements of opinion

Defamation defendants don't have to show "pressing need" to establish common law qualified privilege

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 10 2012

It is accepted law that for a defamatory statement to attract the common law defence of qualified privilege, both the maker and the recipient of the defamatory statement must have an interest in what is conveyed commonly referred to as reciprocity of interest or "community of interest" or a duty must exist on the part of the maker of the statement

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy