We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 16

ACCC pursues misleading credence claims again

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 10 2013

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has again shown its commitment to one of its 2013 focus areas - misleading credence claims

Social media: employee use still a cause for concern

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 18 2012

Linfox Australia has appealed against the recent controversial decision of Glen Stutsel v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd 2011 FWA 8444, where an employee was reinstated following the termination of his employment for posting offensive comments about his managers on Facebook

Yet another case of misleading and deceptive advertising this time La Ionica

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 8 2012

On 23 January 2012, the Federal Court delivered yet another judgment against a business involved in misleading and deceptive advertising

An asterisk won't always suffice: Foxtel fined for misleading advertising

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 23 2012

There can be no doubt that the ACCC is focusing on misleading advertising

New visual art resale royalty introduced

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 7 2009

The Senate has recently passed the Federal government's long-awaited Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists Act 2009 (Cth) (Act

Resale royalty rights scheme for visual artists commences

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 10 2010

Australia's first ever resale royalty scheme for visual artists commenced on 9 June 2010

Internet service provider wins landmark case

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 4 2010

In a judgement delivered this morning, the Federal Court of Australia has held that an internet service provider is not liable for infringements of copyright committed by its customers

'Down Under' infringes copyright in 'Kookaburra'

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 5 2010

The Federal Court yesterday handed down its highly anticipated decision relating to the copyright dispute in respect of the well-known songs 'Down Under' and 'Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree' (Kookaburra

No copyright in headlines

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 17 2010

In a case which has implications for publishers and content aggregators, the Federal Court confirmed in the recent case of Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd that headlines are incapable of attracting copyright

iiNet scoops a win on copyright case

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 1 2011

In a keenly awaited decision made late last week, the Full Federal Court, by a majority, upheld an earlier judgment and affirmed that iiNet was not liable for infringements of copyright committed by its customers