We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

A 'duty to invent' some things, but not others - Royal Children’s Hospital v Robert Alexander

  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 9 2012

The Australian Patents Office (APO) recently considered an application brought by the Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) under sections 32 and 36 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) (Act

Employeremployee ownership of IP applying UWA v Gray

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • January 10 2012

This decision provides some insight into how the Australian Patent Office (APO) may apply the reasoning in University of Western Australia (UWA) v Gray, in particular in circumstances where the employer is not a university

It continues: Sirtex awarded over $2.5 million in UWA v Gray cross-claim

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • July 12 2010

The Federal Court recently handed down the latest judgment (University of Western Australia v Gray (No 29) 2010 FCA 665) in the long-running matter of UWA v Gray, which we have covered in previous In Brief updates