We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 342

US Supreme Court sends Alice down the rabbit hole!

  • FB Rice
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 26 2014

The US Supreme Court has handed down a unanimous ruling in the Alice Corp v. CLS Bank case. The Court has found the method claims of Alice's patents

Isolated nucleic acids are patent eligible in Australia

  • Baldwins
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • June 25 2014

Last year, the Federal Court of Australia confirmed that isolated naturally occurring nucleic acid sequences are patent eligible subject matter. The

New restrictions on US software patents

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • June 25 2014

The US Supreme Court in Alice Corp. v CLS Bank International1 has made it clear that merely confining a process to implementation on a computer

Bowman v Monsanto in an Australian context

  • Freehills Patent Attorneys
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 23 2014

Most will be aware by now of the recent US Supreme Court decision, Bowman v Monsanto Co.,569 US (2013). One question that remains is what would have

Raising the Bar on extensions of time

  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 22 2014

The IP Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012 made substantial changes to the Patents Regulations 1991 (Cth) relating to the conduct of patent

Methods of medical treatment confirmed patentable in Australia but not in New Zealand

  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • June 20 2014

The patentability of methods of medical treatment has been a long debated issue in patent legislation and different jurisdictions have taken very

US court says no to patent on computer-implemented business method

  • AJ Park
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand, USA
  • -
  • June 20 2014

The United States Supreme Court has handed down a decision that appears to align with the approach we are taking in Australia and New Zealand. In

Threatening infringement proceedings: when is it just and when is it bloodlust?

  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 13 2014

The right to take legal action against an infringer is the muscle that gives a granted patent (or certified innovation patent) its strength. But care

Maximising a patentee's legal costs recovery in successful patent litigation

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 13 2014

Section 19 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) arises infrequently in practice, but its provisions can be of real value to a patentee, as was shown in

Documents incorporated by reference do not provide basis to support a priority claim in Australia

  • Houlihan2
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 11 2014

A recent Patent Opposition Decision handed down by the Australian Patent Office clarifies the requirements of incorporating references into priority