We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 373

Isolated gene sequences are patentable in Australia

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • September 8 2014

In a decision handed down on Friday 5 September 2014 a Full Federal Court consisting of 5 Justices affirmed the decision of Nicholas J at first

Isolated genes patentable: Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 5 2014

BREAKING NEWS: Full Federal Court finds that isolated genetic material is patentable subject matter as an artificially created state of affairs. In a

Myriad patent upheld by Full Federal Court of Australia

  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 5 2014

The Full Federal Court of Australia has handed down its long awaited decision in D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc today, affirming that isolated DNA and

Myriad: isolated DNA re-affirmed patentable subject matter in Australia

  • Fisher Adams Kelly
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • September 5 2014

In a decision published today, the Full Federal Court of Australia has dismissed an Appeal against the Federal Court decision of Justice Nicholas and

Full Federal Court confirms isolated DNA and RNA are patentable

  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 5 2014

In D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc 2014 FCAFC 115, five judges in the Full Federal Court of Australia have unanimously upheld a Federal Court decision

The thorny problem of patentable eligible subject matter: part 8 of a 10-part series: Australia update

  • Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • September 5 2014

This is an update to our post last week on "The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Australia." Today, September 5, the Full Court

Is your ‘obvious’ new idea as obvious as you think?

  • Fisher Adams Kelly
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 4 2014

One of the critical tests for whether or not a patent's claims are valid is the test of whether the claims each include an 'inventive step'. An

The thorny problem of patentable eligible subject matter: part 8 of a 10-part series: Australia

  • Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

In Australia, the basic requirements for patentability are found in section 18(1) of the Patents Act (1990) (Act) which provides: an invention is a

A costly exercise s 19(2) of the Patents Act

  • The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 27 2014

Section 19(1) of the Patents Act provides that where the validity of a patent is disputed, the court may certify that the validity of a specified

Where does the scope in substance fall - claim construction in Australia

  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 27 2014

The construction of a patent claim is always decisive in opposition, revocation or infringement proceedings. A set of established principles - or