We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 348

Stem cell patentability: European update following opinion of Advocate-General in ISCC and the Australian position

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union
  • -
  • August 14 2014

A recent Opinion of the Advocate-General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) suggests that a clarification and moderation of the

Samsung and Apple - BFFs again?

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 6 2014

As we have previously reported, from mid-2011 until today Samsung and Apple have locked horns in an intensive patent dispute in the Federal Court of

Do you understand your licence and what terms survive termination? Beware the litigation clause

  • Addisons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 6 2014

The Full Federal Court has determined that a licensee to a licence agreement is liable to contribute towards the licensor’s costs of patent

Update on the patentability of computer implemented business methods

  • Fisher Adams Kelly
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • July 30 2014

In our previous article on the topic of patentable subject matter of computer implemented business methods, we recommended that until a decision in

An oral exclusive licence can provide standing in Australian infringement proceedings

  • Houlihan2
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • July 29 2014

In Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd (No 3) 2014, the Court considered whether one of the Applicants in earlier patent infringement

Australia awaits Federal Court guidance on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions

  • Freehills Patent Attorneys
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • July 23 2014

Anyone with an interest in the patentability of computer-implemented inventions in Australia has been awaiting judgment in the appeal to the Research

Improving the value of your US patent portfolio: lessons for Australian and NZ companies from the decision of Bard v Gore

  • Freehills Patent Attorneys
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand, USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Recent developments in US law have meant that investors conducting due diligence of biotech and technology companies now not only consider whether

Liability of licensee continues after expiration

  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • July 17 2014

In the recent decision of Austral Masonry (NSW) Pty Ltd v Cementech Pty Limited 2014 FCAFC 72 the Full Federal Court, in rejecting an appeal by

Patents Act 2013: biological exclusions and indigenous rights

  • James & Wells Intellectual Property
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • July 11 2014

The Patents Act 2013 represents a significant shift for patent law in this country and a major overhaul of the current 1953 Act. This reform follows

Former licensee liable to contribute to licensor’s costs of patent infringement proceedings post-expiration

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • July 9 2014

The Full Federal Court has held that, under an exclusive patent licence agreement, a former licensee is liable to contribute towards the licensor’s