We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 35

Full Federal Court agrees that copyright subsists in original printer cartridge chart

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • January 30 2013

In a continuation of a battle between two printer cartridge resellers, the Full Federal Court has affirmed the legal principles pronounced by the

High court denies Optus leave to appeal TV Now copyright decision

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 2 2012

In September, the High Court consisting of Justices Gummow, Bell and Hayne refused to grant Optus special leave to appeal the decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in the Optus TV Now case

Apotex appeal fails: no implied license over Sanofi's copyright in leflunomide product information

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 27 2012

The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia has recently confirmed that Apotex did not have an implied licence to copy the Product Information (PI) for trade rival Sanofi's anti-arthritis drug, Arava (active ingredient leflunomide) for the purposes of obtaining TGA approval of Apotex's generic leflunomide products

Optus TV now suspended after NRL and AFL victorious on appeal

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 22 2012

On 27 April 2012, the Full Federal Court of Australia delivered its eagerly awaited judgment concerning Optus’ cloud-based recording service, TV Now

End of the road for Roadshow: iiNet did not authorise copyright infringement

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 9 2012

On 20 April, the High Court of Australia delivered a long awaited judgment to finally determine the four-year copyright dispute between internet service provider (ISP) iiNet, and 34 Australian and United States movie studios

NRL and AFL victorious on appeal: Optus TV now found to infringe copyright

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 27 2012

The Federal Court of Australia has this morning handed down an eagerly awaited judgment concerning Optus’ cloud-based recording service, TV Now

iiNet’s High Court victory: ISP did not authorise copyright infringements by customers

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 25 2012

In an historic judgment handed down on 20 April, the High Court of Australia has unanimously held that internet service provider (ISP) iiNet did not authorise the infringement by its customers of the copyright in films and television programmes owned or exclusively licensed by 34 Australian and United States movie studios

“Sample” leaves DJ in red for damages for infringement of rapper's moral rights

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 27 2012

In an Australian first, the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia has ordered an award of damages to an internationally renowned raphip-hop artist known as “Pitbull” (aka, Mr Armando Perez) for infringement of his moral right of integrity of authorship by a Perth DJ known as “DJ Suave” (aka, Mr Jaime Fernandez

Copyright infringement in house plans: when will inferences be drawn about similar features?

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 27 2012

As a general proposition, people do not commence legal proceedings lightly

Fed court: Optus didn't infringe copyright, but AFL can liken it to "stealing"

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 6 2012

The copyright dispute involving Australian telecommunications provider Optus and Australian digital sports broadcasting rights holders recently took on a new twist as Optus and the Australian Football League (AFL) returned to Court to ventilate fresh allegations against each other