We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 397

Intellectual property: what it is and who needs to protect it?

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 18 2014

Whether large or small, a business may have Intellectual Property (IP) in its brand, products, or processes. If these set the company apart from

Game of thrones, 3D printers & copyright

  • HopgoodGanim
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 2 2013

Click here to watch the podcast. We're joined once again by Hayden Delaney, who is a Partner in the Intellectual Property and Technology Group at

Game of Thrones, 3D printers & copyright

  • HopgoodGanim
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 24 2013

We're joined once again by Hayden Delaney, who is a Partner in the Intellectual Property and Technology Group at HopgoodGanim. Hayden thank you so

Chocolate seahorse not distinctive

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 15 2009

In an appeal from a decision of a Delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks, the Federal Court has held that Guylian's seahorse shape was not sufficiently distinctive to qualify for registration under section 41(3) of the Act, and did not and would not have capacity to distinguish Guylian's pralines and chocolates from those of other traders under section 41(5) of the Act

Parametritis: inventive step - Euroceltique S.A. v Sandoz Pty Ltd

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • November 20 2009

This decision of the Australian Patent Office (Office) is of interest to the extent that it outlines the approach that the Office will take in considering the validity of a claim limited by reference to specified parameters

Rihanna v Topshop and the fight for Queensberry - recent UK case law on merchandising and bad faith - part 1

  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • -
  • Australia, United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 2 2013

Mr Justice Birss, newly elevated to the High Court of England & Wales, has handed down two decisions in the last week in which so-called "t-shirt

Australia: R&D tax incentive changes

  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • January 28 2014

In January 2014, a number of submissions were made by interested parties on the changes proposed by the Tax Laws Amendment (Research and Development

E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 26 2009

In the long-running dispute between E & J GALLO WINERY and LION NATHAN AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED regarding the trade mark BAREFOOT, GALLO has been successful in obtaining special leave to appeal the judgment of the Full Federal Court

Ownership of IP UWA v Gray

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 8 2009

Universitiesand companies dealing with universities in the commercialisation of intellectual propertywill need to review how universities have the rights to intellectual property developed by academics

A Gray day for UWA - ownership of inventions by university employees

  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 23 2009

In a keenly awaited decision, UWA v Gray 2009 FCAFC 116, the Full Federal Court upheld an earlier decision of Justice French that the University of Western Australia (UWA) did not own the rights to inventions made by one of its employees, Dr Bruce Gray