We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 136

Liquidator is not appropriate appointee to trust

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • April 3 2013

Justice Dobson has recently reversed his interim ruling that section 17A Judicature Act 1908 gives the Court jurisdiction to appoint a liquidator to

The 'big five' insolvency issues for 2013

  • Chapman Tripp
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • March 8 2013

Several issues of far-reaching significance in the world of restructuring and insolvency will be decided by the courts, and by Parliament, this year

Limited liability - the pulse of our economy

  • Chapman Tripp
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • February 22 2013

New Zealand is a highly entrepreneurial society. Even during the sluggish economic growth of the past three years, we have maintained an average

Consultation paper on insurance solvency standards

  • Russell McVeagh
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • February 13 2013

The Reserve Bank has published a consultation paper on insurance solvency standards: the quality of capital and regulatory treatment of financial

Appointment of liquidators to trusts

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • December 20 2012

In a recent High Court decision, a bank (B) applied to appoint liquidators to the TPS Asset Trust and TPS Asset No2 Trust (Trusts

Court of Appeal rejects High Court's categorisation of insolvent transactions

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • December 20 2012

In our March 2012 update we reported on a claim under section 294 of the Companies Act 1993 by the liquidators of Five Star Finance Limited (in liquidation) (FSF) against a trustee of a trading trust (Bowden No. 14 Trust (Trust)) to set aside payments amounting to $928,937.79

Privilege in receiverships - the importance of a solicitor's terms of engagement

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • December 20 2012

In Carey v Korda receivers had been appointed to companies within the Westpoint Group

Court of Appeal affirms the imposition of trading restrictions on a bankrupt

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • December 20 2012

Armitage v Established Investments Limited (in liq) involved an appeal by an undischarged bankrupt (A), against a High Court decision imposing conditions that A was not to engage in business for three years following discharge at the end of his bankruptcy

Priority of security interests

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • December 20 2012

The recent Court of Appeal decision in Healy Holmberg Trading Partnership v Grant, clarified the issue of prioritising multiple security interest claims

Creditor proposals to be derisory

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • December 20 2012

In the Court of Appeal decision of Herbert v New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited, the Court declined to grant Mrs Herbert's appeal in relation to the High Court's refusal to approve her creditor's proposal

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy