We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 162

Idaho Supreme Court holds there is coverage for attorney's fees even though there are no covered damages

  • Bullivant Houser Bailey PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Last week, the Idaho Supreme Court held that Employers Mutual Casualty Company is required to cover attorney's fees awarded against a builder that it

When does an "occurrence" occur?

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

Two federal courts in Denver recently addressed a fundamental question that exists in almost every construction defect case - when did the property

Sixth Circuit holds that insurer is required to defend contractor in claim by customer, as "your work" exclusion in CGL policy is inapplicable

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 25 2013

As seen in DRI's The Voice In Forrest Construction, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co., No. 11-6262, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 722 (6th Cir.), the

Faulty workmanship can be an accident

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

After a spate of bad decisions for policyholders on whether general liability policies can ever provide coverage for construction liabilities, three

Wrongful acts "related" if there is factual tie between acts

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2013

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, applying New York law, held that the term "related" in a professional

Errors in design of building exterior not related

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, applying New York law, held that the term "related" in a professional

Eleventh Circuit allows consideration of extrinsic evidence

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2013

In its recent decision in American Safety Indemnity Co. v. T.H. Taylor, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072 (11th Cir. March 14, 2013), the United States Court

Update on coverage for Colorado construction defects TCD & Colorado pool

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2013

Over the past few years, we have monitored the efforts of some in the insurance industry to deny coverage for construction defect claims brought by

Pennsylvania court holds drywall claims arose out of single occurrence

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2013

In its recent decision in Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Devon International, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20659 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2013), the United States

Insurer must defend claims based on insured’s use of non-pollutant floor sealer

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

A federal court in Missouri has determined that a floor-sealing product used by a construction cleanup company was not a "pollutant" and that the