We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 78

Sitework contractor awarded lost profits for developer’s breach

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2013

Recently, the Ohio Sixth Appellate District confirmed that a failure to communicate can constitute a breach of contract and held that the injured

Construction insurance fundamentals

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2012

"The Heiles argue that the policy exclusions relied on by State Auto do not apply here."

Court enforces limitations on the scope of an arbitration provision

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 1 2012

When parties to a contract agree to resolve their disputes through arbitration, Ohio courts will generally force the parties to arbitrate

Expert testimony explaining how engineer’s conduct fell below the standard of care is necessary to establish negligence

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 1 2012

A technical breach by an engineer of its design professional agreement may not be enough to establish that the engineer is negligent

The importance of unambiguous contract language

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 1 2012

A recent case from the Eleventh Appellate District provides an example of what can happen when parties enter into a contract that contains ambiguous language

Trial court reversed in challenge of contract award

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

Disappointed bidders who challenge a public owner’s award of a construction contract face a severely uphill battle in Ohio

Ohio’s statute of repose bars home owners’ claims against even an unqualified builder

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

Ohio’s statute of repose, R.C. 2305.131, bars claims against professionals who provide construction or design services on improvements to real property that arise from defective and unsafe conditions more than 10 years after the date of substantial completion of the improvement

Claim filing time limit enforced

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

A recent case appealed from the Court of Claims of Ohio points up the importance of strictly complying with contract provisions regarding time limitations for making claims

Court of claims jurisdiction clarified in mechanics’ lien case

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

Discussion of four Ohio court of appeals decisions involving construction disputes

What the courts are saying: a contract’s notice provisions are strictly enforced in Ohio

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 27 2012

In a recent case, the Ohio Court of Claims strictly enforced a contract’s notice provisions against a contractor when the contractor failed to provide notice of its claim within the time required by the contract