We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 13

Ohio utility protection law undergoes significant changes

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2013

On December 20, 2012, Governor John Kasich signed Substitute House Bill 458 into law. This new law, which goes into effect on March 27, 2013 (just in

Ohio’s statute of repose bars home owners’ claims against even an unqualified builder

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

Ohio’s statute of repose, R.C. 2305.131, bars claims against professionals who provide construction or design services on improvements to real property that arise from defective and unsafe conditions more than 10 years after the date of substantial completion of the improvement

Claim filing time limit enforced

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

A recent case appealed from the Court of Claims of Ohio points up the importance of strictly complying with contract provisions regarding time limitations for making claims

Trial court reversed in challenge of contract award

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

Disappointed bidders who challenge a public owner’s award of a construction contract face a severely uphill battle in Ohio

Court of claims jurisdiction clarified in mechanics’ lien case

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

Discussion of four Ohio court of appeals decisions involving construction disputes

Construction reform breaks out of its shell an update on Ohio’s construction reform

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 27 2012

In our Fall 2011 issue of BrickerConstructionLaw.com, we presented you with Construction Reform in a Nutshell, describing the processes adopted by the General Assembly as a result of Amended Substitute H.B. 153

Sole-source procurement for Ohio public owners, especially with regard to construction of treatment works

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2011

This quarter, we open with an article on sole source procurement for public owners, especially with regard to water and wastewater treatment works, in an article that will also appear in Bricker & Eckler LLP's new and upcoming newsletter dedicated to construction issues in the water and wastewater industry

Utility protection: potential contractor and third party liabilities

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2010

Sixth and final in a series

Unanticipated code requirements are not a differing site condition on designbuild project

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2010

From an owner's perspective, one of the greatest advantages of a designbuild contract is that there is a single point of responsibility for both designing and constructing the projectthe designbuilder

Recent cases offer hope to Ohio contractors impacted by mismarked utilities

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 15 2009

Over the years Ohio appellate courts have not been consistent in cases where contractors have sought damages from utility companies who fail to accurately mark their underground utilities