Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 14

Eleventh Circuit allows consideration of extrinsic evidence

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
March 19 2013

In its recent decision in American Safety Indemnity Co. v. T.H. Taylor, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072 (11th Cir. March 14, 2013), the United States Court

Pennsylvania court holds drywall claims arose out of single occurrence

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
February 19 2013

In its recent decision in Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Devon International, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20659 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2013), the United States

Montana court addresses business risk exclusions

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
February 12 2013

In its recent decision in Lukes v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17979 (D. Mont. Feb. 11, 2013), the United States District Court for

Florida court finds no coverage for Chinese drywall claim

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
July 18 2012

its recent decision in First Specialty Insurance Corp. v. Milton Construction Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97972 (S.D. Fla. July 16, 2012), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida had occasion to revisit the issue of whether the total pollution exclusion applied to a class action lawsuit alleging harms caused by Chinese drywall

Oregon court holds general contractor not performing professional services

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
April 27 2012

In its recent decision in State Farm and Casualty Co. v. Lorrick Pacific, LLC, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57922 (D. Ore. Apr. 24, 2012), the United States District Court for the District of Oregon had occasion to consider whether a general contractor’s coordination and management of subcontractors constituted “professional services” for the purpose of an exclusion in a general liability policy

Eighth Circuit holds claim against general contractor not an occurrence

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
March 6 2012

In its recent decision in Secura Ins. v. Horizon Plumbing, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4477 (8th Cir. Mar. 5, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, applying Missouri law, considered whether an underlying breach of contract claim could be construed as an “occurrence” triggering coverage under a general liability policy

Illinois federal court rejects dismissal based on abstention doctrine

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
March 1 2012

In its recent decision in Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. Construction Builders In Motion, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25240 (E.D. Ill. Feb. 28, 2012), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, considered whether a declaratory judgment action should be dismissed on the basis of the WiltonBrillhart abstention doctrine

4th circuit holds no duty to defend insurance broker in bodily injury suit

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
December 12 2011

In its recent decision in Houston Cas. Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24157 (4th Cir. Dec. 6, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, applying South Carolina law, considered whether a general liability insurer had a duty to defend its insured, an insurance broker, in connection with an underlying construction site injury lawsuit

Third Circuit finds additional insured coverage based on peculiar risk doctrine

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
November 16 2011

In its recent decision Lafayette College v. Selective Insurance Company, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22721 (3d Cir. Nov. 10, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, applying Pennsylvania law, addressed under what circumstances additional insured coverage may be triggered

Illinois court holds no duty to defend water intrusion claim

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
November 11 2011

In its recent decision Lagestee-Mulder, Inc. v. Consol. Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129308 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 8, 2011), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois addressed what allegations must be made in a construction defect lawsuit in order to trigger coverage under a general liability policy