We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 3,044

FCC denies e-rate appeal for improper service provider conduct in competitive bid

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

Shortly after I posted an entry noting the FCC's denial of e-rate appeals for competitive bidding violations, the Wireline Competition Bureau issued

Auto dealers allege Carfax is a competitive lemon in antitrust suit

  • Constantine Cannon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

More than 120 auto dealers in 17 states are alleging in a new $50 million antitrust suit that they paid higher prices for less reliable vehicle

DOJ’s Bazaarvoice complaint: a risk to all transactions despite HSR reporting thresholds

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

A recent complaint filed by the Department of Justice ("DOJ") challenging the acquisition of PowerReviews, Inc. by Bazaarvoice, Inc. should serve as

Antitrust trends

  • Paul Hastings LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

Litigation Partner MJ Moltenbrey outlines antitrust trends

California Court of Appeal allows injunction under unfair competition law to prevent horizontal competitor from diverting business through unlawful means

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

For many years, California's Unfair Competition Law had no traditional standing requirements. But since the passage of Proposition 64 in 2004

Buy more, save more: exclusivity conditions, loyalty rebates, and competition law

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

It can sometimes be unlawful for a supplier with a strong market position to offer its customers long-term supply terms with volume rebates which are

Antitrust division ends public naming practice

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

On April 12 2013 William J Baer, assistant attorney general in charge of the US Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, released a statement

Feels so Wright, can’t be wrong

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

Continuing my run of posts inspired by the Spring Meeting, let's touch on the other bit of news that came out at the time. I wasn't present when he

The Fair Trade Commission punished nine independent power plants (“IPP”) in concerted action.

  • Tsar & Tsai
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

The Fair Trade Commission ("FTC") found that nine IPPs which entered into electricity supply contracts with the TaiPower Company had committed

DOJ announces changes to Antitrust Division’s “carve out” practice

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

On April 12, 2013, the Department of Justice announced changes to the Antitrust Division's carve out practices concerning negotiations with companies