We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-1 of 1

Ninth Circuit finds that new home buyer plaintiffs fail to satisfy per se tying element that amount of commerce not be "insubstantial"

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 3 2009

Buyers of newly constructed homes in the Boise, Idaho, area filed a federal antitrust class action, alleging that realtors representing owners of undeveloped property tied the sale of the undeveloped lots to realtors’ services and commissions that included the new homes constructed on the lots by contractors, as well at the value of the lot