We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Gasoline purchaser's own testimony derails his deceptive practices claim

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2010

Michael Siegel is a retail gasoline consumer

The Sherman Act does not preempt Wisconsin's minimum gasoline markup requirement

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2010

A Wisconsin statute requires a minimum markup on gasoline sold in the state

Complaint fails to adequately allege FTAIA exception

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 23 2011

The plaintiff and other direct and indirect United States potash purchasers brought a class action against potash producers

Recent DOJ settlement highlights the risks associated with certain joint bid or non-bid arrangements

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2012

Two natural gas developers this month agreed to pay a total of $550,000 to settle claims that they violated the Sherman Act and the False Claims Act by engaging in an anticompetitive bidding arrangement