We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

A comparison of the Cincinnati Bell and Beazer say-on-pay decisions

  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2011

In Cincinnati Bell, the United States District Court declined to grant a motion to dismiss a law suit resulting from a failed say-on-pay vote

Court refuses to dismiss say-on-pay lawsuit

  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2011

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio recently refused to grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss litigation resulting from Cincinnati Bell’s failed say-on-pay vote required by the Dodd-Frank Act

SEC stays proxy access rules

  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 4 2010

As we noted last week, the Business Roundtable and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (the "petitioners") filed a petition with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit seeking review of recent changes to the SEC's proxy and related rules