We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 47

Litigation preparedness: are you equipped for the demands of e-discovery?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 21 2014

With email prevailing as a prolific medium of communication for businesses of all sizes, the demands of e-discovery are no longer limited to large

Does posting a LinkedIn status violate a non-solicitation agreement?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 12 2014

A Connecticut company brought suit against a former employee alleging violations of a non-compete agreement and the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets

Curtailing the use of non-disparagement clauses

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 25 2014

As previously noted, there has been an increase in attempts by businesses to prevent others from disparaging them online. This often shows up in some

Protecting internal company investigation communications

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 21 2014

A recent decision from the United States District Court, District of Columbia, generated a great deal of uncertainty and concern in the business

The wedding planner, the disparagement and the litigation

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2014

A Los Angeles television station recently reported about the rise of non-disparagement clauses in contracts with Southern California wedding planners

Listening to your shareholders

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2014

In March, Safeway grocery stores announced that it was going to be acquired by the private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management L.P. Cerberus

Executives behaving badly: Macy’s wins some Penney’s

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 20 2014

The longstanding litigation between Macy's and J.C. Penney appears to have finally reached a conclusion. This case received some notoriety because it

Class certification denied under rules 23(a)(2) and 23(b)(3) where individualized inquiries were required for car dealers’ claims

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 12 2014

In Auto. Leasing Corp. v. Mahindra & Mahindra, Ltd., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33224 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 14, 2014), 340 car dealers collectively paid the

Businesses receiving favorable decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2014

While controversial decisions on social issues by the United States Supreme Court are garnering more attention, the Court's recent decisions on

Do credit card fees affect your company’s bottom line?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2014

In December 2013, a federal judge approved a $5.7 billion class action settlement between merchants and Visa and MasterCard over swipe and