Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

Nevada Supreme Court addresses delivery of dissenters’ rights notices

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
-
USA
-
July 13 2011

Last week, the Nevada Supreme Court answered the question of whether notice of dissenters’ rights must be delivered to both stockholders of record and beneficial owners

At the PCAOB, they give no words but “mum”

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
-
USA
-
June 20 2011

In March, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board issued its first public research note

Court of Appeal decides buy-out questions under Re-RULPA

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
-
USA
-
September 28 2011

California’s Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, commonly known as Re-RULPA, established a mechanism by which partners can avoid a judicial dissolution of the partnership by purchasing for cash the partnership interest owned by the partners initiating the judicial dissolution proceeding

CalPERS considers revisions to global governance principles

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
-
USA
-
October 23 2011

At a meeting last week, the Policy Subcommittee of the Investment Committee of CalPERS’ Board of Administration considered amendments to CalPERS’ Global Principles of Corporate Governance

Why corporations receive shareholder proposals

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
-
USA
-
September 20 2011

Recently, I spoke at an ”essentials” program presented by the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals

What does the UCC have to do with M&A anyway?

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
-
USA
-
July 31 2012

For several years, I taught a law school class covering sales, personal property leases, and documents of title Uniform Commercial Code Articles 1, 2, 2A, and 7

1 for 3 million reverse split fraud claim survives motion to dismiss

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
-
USA
-
August 28 2012

Nancy Wojtas at Cooley LLP alerted me to an interesting ruling case decided last week by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Gardner v. Major Auto. Cos., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118191 (E.D. N.Y. Aug. 21, 2012