We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 7,181

Supreme Court charts when foreign companies may be sued in Illinois: is the stream of commerce overflowing?

  • Quarles & Brady LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The Illinois Supreme Court recently issued a decision that will significantly affect when foreign corporations may be sued in Illinois courts. In

Pay attention to the expiration date

  • Scott & Scott LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

In various types of technology contracts, you often have change orders or separate scope of work agreements ("SOW"), which ultimately refer to or

Third Circuit adopts and expands “employee” test for Title VII cases

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently adopted a six-factor test to determine whether a shareholder-director of a company could be

Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal holds statute establishing standard of proof in slip-and-fall cases is retroactive

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In Kenz v. Miami-Dade County and Unicco Service Co., 2013 (Fla. 3d DCA April 24, 2013), Florida's Third DCA ruled that 768.0755, Fla. Stat

U.S. Senate committee criticizes Apple, Inc. offshore tax practices relationship to “Swiss principal” structures

  • Kurtin PLLC
  • -
  • Ireland, Switzerland, USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

On May 20, 2013, the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations published a memorandum criticizing the practices of consumer electronics

Avoiding investment scams

  • Diaz Reus
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

Every year, people lose millions of dollars to scams of every size and kind. Investment scams are particularly dangerous because they come in many

Ohio Supreme Court holds mortgage servicing not subject to Consumer Sales Practices Act

  • BuckleySandler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On May 14, the Ohio Supreme Court held in response to two certified questions from a federal district court that the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices

Partnership law permits one party to unilaterally withdraw from oral agreement if venture is not for a definite term or a particular undertaking

  • Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Section 62(1)(b) of the Partnership Law provides that a partnership formed by an oral agreement may be unilaterally dissolved "if no definite term or

CFPB makes first preemption determinations on state unclaimed property laws relating to gift cards

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Recently, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published a final determination as to whether the unclaimed property laws of Maine and

Supplier relationships: where breakdowns occur

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Supplier relationships do not break down overnight. Often the reasons or causes for the breakdowns are not those in the moment, but those that