We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral argument on a case which could have an impact on the availability of mandatory arbitration and class action waivers in consumer contracts
CompuCredit Corporation, et al. v. Greenwood, et al. (U.S. Supreme Court Dkt. No. 10-948), is the latest case since AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 113 S.Ct. 1740 (2011) to be decided by the Supreme Court affecting arbitration agreements in consumer contracts
On March 25, 2009, the Ohio Supreme Court held that a plaintiff cannot pierce the corporate veil of one corporation to reach another corporation, where both corporations have common shareholders but do not have any ownership interest in each other
