We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 22

Apartment buildings and exclusive videointernet contracts: FCC opens rulemaking

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2007

Apartment building owners and developers, CATV companies, and competing videointernet providers take note

FCC precludes exclusive agreements between cable operators and MDU owners

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 15 2007

On October 31, 2007, the FCC announced that it was taking action to address exclusive service contracts between cable operators providing video services and owners of multi-dwelling unit properties (MDUs

FCC decides bulk billing and exclusive marketing arrangements in the provision of video services to MDUs should not be restricted

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2010

On March 2, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") released a Second Report and Order ("Order") in MD Docket 07-51, declining to prohibit Multichannel Video Program Distributors ("MVPDs) from utilizing bulk billing or exclusive marketing arrangements in Multiple Dwelling Units ("MDUs"

Richmond casino case: how early is too early for CEQA?

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 15 2010

In Parchester Village Neighborhood Council v. City of Richmond, the California Court of Appeal recently held that the City of Richmond’s decision to enter into a Municipal Services Agreement (MSA) with a Native American tribe did not constitute a “project” requiring California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, even though the agreement effectively committed the City to a particular course of action

Avoiding marketing pitfalls that could bring litigation to your doorstep

  • Lane Powell PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 13 2010

Most providers of senior housing and assisted-living services market their communities in many ways; through written materials, web-based advertisements, testimonials, and broad-based advertisements, to name just a few

FTC enforcement action reminds that sweepstakes entries are not express permission or EBR for telemarketing calls

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2011

The FTC entered a stipulated judgment and order with a company that sells power wheelchairs and electric scooters, to settle charges that Electric Mobility Corporation violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule's "("TSR") "do not call" restrictions by placing marketing calls to consumers who submitted sweepstakes entries that included their phone numbers

FCC approves Comcast-NBCU deal; conditions affect online video programming and affordable broadband commitments

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 18 2011

Today the FCC granted approval of the Comcast-NBCU transaction, with conditions and commitments, of course

"Put your makeup on, fix your hair up pretty, and meet me tonight in Atlantic City."

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2011

Apparently there is more than fist bumping (pumping?) going on "down the Shore."

A primer for obtaining outdoor advertising sign permits along New Jersey’s limited access highways

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 17 2011

The billboard industry is highly regulated in New Jersey and in other states

Southern District of New York hears oral argument on motion to dismiss in Gifford et al. v. USGBC

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2011

This past Tuesday, July 26, U.S. District Court Judge Leonard Sand heard oral argument on USGBC’s motion to dismiss Henry Gifford’s amended complaint in Gifford et al. v. USGBC, still pending in the Southern District of New York