Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 48

Supreme Court: securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove materiality to certify a class

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
March 19 2013

The Supreme Court recently issued a much-anticipated decision in Amgen, holding that securities class action plaintiffs do not have to prove that

Supreme Court: statute of limitations in SEC fraud cases begins to run when fraud occurs, not when discovered

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
February 27 2013

The Supreme Court today ruled that in an SEC action to recover civil penalties, the five-year statute of limitations begins to run when fraud occurs

Supreme Court holds that securities fraud plaintiffs do not have to prove materiality to certify a class

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
February 27 2013

The Supreme Court issued a much-anticipated decision today in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, No. 11-1085, 568 U.S. __

New FCPA decision: how long is the FCPA’s reach?

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
February 14 2013

A little more than a year after Deustche Telekom ("DT") and Magyar Telekom entered into multi-million dollar settlements with the SEC and DOJ to

It’s not dead yet: the SEC fights another market timing battle

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
February 12 2013

In a case arising out of the 2003 marketing timing scandals, the U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Gabelli v. Securities and

ALJ bars fund PM over pricing matter

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
February 12 2013

The SEC's Chief Administrative Law Judge sanctioned a former bond fund portfolio manager for withholding material information from a fund fair

Excessive fee case survives motion to dismiss

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
February 12 2013

On December 17, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey allowed a Section 36(b) excessive fee claim to proceed against Hartford

Court orders hedge fund to disgorge funds in connection with deceptive returns

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
February 12 2013

On January 9, 2013, the SEC announced that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District ordered a hedge fund manager and one of its principals

Federal court decision supports use of “big-boy letters”

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
December 18 2012

“Big-Boy Letters” are often used as a tool to limit an issuer’s or broker-dealer’s potential liability in connection with a private sale of securities

SEC extends temporary rule for adviser principal trades

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
October 22 2012

The SEC has proposed to extend by two years a temporary rule that establishes an alternative means for registered investment advisers that are also registered as broker-dealers to meet the requirements of Section 206(3) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 when they act in a principal capacity in transactions with certain of their advisory clients

next >

Search results

Supreme Court: securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove materiality to certify a class

Supreme Court: statute of limitations in SEC fraud cases begins to run when fraud occurs, not when discovered

Supreme Court holds that securities fraud plaintiffs do not have to prove materiality to certify a class

New FCPA decision: how long is the FCPA’s reach?

It’s not dead yet: the SEC fights another market timing battle

ALJ bars fund PM over pricing matter

Excessive fee case survives motion to dismiss

Court orders hedge fund to disgorge funds in connection with deceptive returns

Federal court decision supports use of “big-boy letters”

SEC extends temporary rule for adviser principal trades

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea