We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 31

Many courts are reluctant to permit parties to redact filed documents, or to file them under seal, even when they contain trade secrets

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2015

In a patent infringement case pending in a California federal court, the defendant moved for summary judgment. The parties jointly requested leave to

Jury awards $58.7 million for trade secret misappropriation after technology disclosure pursuant to NDA

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2015

On March 6, in a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case, Texas Advanced Optoelectric Solutions (TAOS) Inc. obtained a verdict

Takin’ bacon: trade secret case dismissed after patent filed

  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 10 2015

A federal court in Minnesota rejected a company's misappropriation of trade secret claim, finding that the publication of a patent related to the

Federal Circuit upholds ITC’s authority to enforce consent order covering third-party products

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC, the

Diaper maker’s patent claims soiled by delay

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

This case relates to adult incontinence products. The district court, based on a delay of more than six-years in filing the lawsuit, held that the

Court crushes Krush’s motions for preliminary injunction on patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 27 2014

Krush Communications, LLC ("Krush") brought suit in New Jersey in 2013 against Lunex Telecom, Inc., a Georgia corporation ("Lunex"), for patent

Expect focus - volume III, Summer 2014

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2014

EXPECTFOCUS is a quarterly review of developments in the insurance and financial services industry, provided on a complimentary basis to clients and

Texas federal court imposes ongoing royalty rather than permanent injunction against alleged trade secret misappropriator

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 15 2014

A Texas federal trial court, finding the absence of any legal precedence to award an ongoing royalty in a trade secret misappropriation case, looked

California appellate court clarifies that general design concepts are entitled to trade secret protection under California’s implementation of UTSA

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2014

In a recent opinion comparing and contrasting trade secret law and patent law, Altavion v. Konica Minolta Systems Laboratory, Inc., 226 Cal. App. 4th

An order denying summary judgment is not an appealable final judgment

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2014

In a non-precedential opinion addressing the issue of appellate jurisdiction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal