We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 39

Law firm targeted by science publisher answers copyright infringement complaint

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2012

The law firm that was sued for copying and disseminating copyrighted articles from scientific journals for submission with its clients’ patent applications to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has filed its response to the copyright infringement claims

Overview of intellectual property cases before the Supreme Court in the October 2011 Term

  • Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2011

In keeping with its recent trend, the Supreme Court has so far agreed to hear one copyright and several patent cases during the October 2011 Term

Copyright (and patent) misuse - it's narrower than you think

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 9 2011

The copyright misuse doctrine does not prohibit a copyright owner from requiring that licensees use the copyrighted work only on it own products

The Supreme Court continues to take on IP issues; is Congress picking up the patent reform torch again too?

  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear two patent-related cases, as well as a copyright case. The copyright case, Petrella v

Jury rules that Google infringed copyright: but was it fair?

  • Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 18 2012

A Californian jury has ruled that the Android mobile platform, which is operated by Google Inc, infringes copyright relating to the Java programming language, which is owned by Oracle Corp

One size doesn’t fit all

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

Design patents, trade dress and copyrights each have different requirements, resulting in the need for a multi-faceted approach

Disposable cameras side with Omega watches: the film empire strikes back

  • Burns & Levinson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2010

Following the Intel amicus brief in Costco v. Omega, Fujifilm, Seiko Epson and Epson filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent’s (Omega’s) position that the first sale doctrine, which ends the rights of the copyright owner after a sale, does not apply to items made and sold outside the United States

ITC starts investigation into certain radio control hobby transmitters and receivers and products containing same

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2011

Horizon Hobby Inc. filed a complaint with the ITC on January 6, 2011, naming over Koko Technology Ltd. of Shenzhen, China and Cyclone Toy & Hobby of Shenzhen, China as respondents

Supreme Court watch: copyright and patent cases granted certiorari

  • Leydig Voit & Mayer Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 5 2014

Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. to resolve a circuit court split regarding the use of laches, or time limits on the right to sue, in copyright cases

Arbitration victory for Toshiba

  • Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2011

The firm recently won a complete victory for Toshiba Corporation in an AAAICDR arbitration in New York