We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 44

Potentially disruptive California sales tax decision

  • Jones Day
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2011

On April 27, 2011, the California Court of Appeal's decision in Nortel Networks Inc. v. State Board of Equalization became final

Consent to assume patent & copyright licenses needed in mergers and acquisitions

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 17 2010

In its September 2009 decision, Cincom Systems, Inc. v. Novelis Corp., the Sixth Circuit ruled that although it is state law that determines whether a transaction transfers a patent or copyright license, federal law prohibits the transfer of such a license without the express consent of the license's originator

Arbitration victory for Toshiba

  • Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2011

The firm recently won a complete victory for Toshiba Corporation in an AAAICDR arbitration in New York

Copyright (and patent) misuse - it's narrower than you think

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 9 2011

The copyright misuse doctrine does not prohibit a copyright owner from requiring that licensees use the copyrighted work only on it own products

Got a design patent lawsuit? Hire a copyright lawyer

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2010

Businesses involved in design patent litigation would be well-served to consult IP counsel with copyright expertise

Perfecting security interests in intellectual property not as obvious as you might think

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2012

The economy has not been kind to many businesses in the last several years

American Institute of Physics and John Wiley & Sons v. Schwegman Ludberg first battle won by copyright owners

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2012

In a copyright infringement case of significant importance, the first battle has been won by publishers American Institute of Physics and John Wiley & Sons, Inc

$1 million in costs and fees assessed as sanction for spoliation

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2011

A federal magistrate judge in Maryland has determined that the plaintiffs in a case involving alleged patent and copyright violations incurred $1.05 million in reasonable costs and attorney’s fees for discovery “that would not have been undertaken but for Defendants’ spoliation, as well as the briefings and hearings regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions.”

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2012

Plaintiff owner of copyright in “Java,” a software platform, brought suit against defendant owner of Android, a competing software platform designed for mobile computing devices, claiming infringement of its patents and copyrighted works related to incremental improvements to the efficiency and security of the Java system

Law firm targeted by science publisher answers copyright infringement complaint

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2012

The law firm that was sued for copying and disseminating copyrighted articles from scientific journals for submission with its clients’ patent applications to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has filed its response to the copyright infringement claims