We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 75

Court reminds plaintiff of Rule 11 obligation in adult movie download case

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 24 2012

Judge Kim denied two Doe defendants’ motions to quash subpoenas to their Internet service providers in this copyright case involving BitTorrent downloads of adult movies as part of a “swarm.”

Court grants summary judgment based upon no likelihood of confusion

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2013

Judge Nolan granted defendant E. Mishan & Sons (“EMS”) motion for summary judgment on plaintiff Hearthware’s copyright, Lanham Act and related state law

Copyright management information must be on same web page

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

Judge Kendall denied plaintiff Personal Keepsakes’ (“PKI”) motion to reconsider in this copyright and Digital Millenium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) case

Discovery limited to avoid a fishing expedition

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2013

Judge Keys granted in part defendant MBHB’s motion to compel document production and request for admission responses in this copyright case involving

Alleged seeding of copyrighted material on BitTorrent is not copyright misuse

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

Judge Kennelly granted in part plaintiff Malibu Media’s motion to dismiss Doe defendant’s counterclaim and certain of its nineteen affirmative

Plaintiff may not dismiss claims in response to summary judgment motion

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 20 2014

Judge St. Eve, after previously deferring ruling to allow the parties to work out procedural disputes, granted defendant John Wiley & Sons’ motion

BitTorrent: motion to quash is not a proper vehicle for severing does

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

Judge Leinenweber denied Doe 39s motion to quash a pre-discovery subpoena in this BitTorrent case involving the motion picture “Under the Bed.” At

Default judgment requires damages prove-up

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2012

Judge Shadur acknowledged that pro se plaintiff’s motion for default was timely in this copyright infringement case

Bald recitation of standard dismissed

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 17 2012

Judge Grady granted in part defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff Flava Works' complaint in this copyright case involving adult entertainment on the internet

Counterclaim need not plead facts to overcome statute of limitations affirmative defense

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

Judge Shadur denied plaintiff Flava Works’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss defendant’s copyright infringement counterclaims. The fact that