We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 76

Court grants summary judgment based upon no likelihood of confusion

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2013

Judge Nolan granted defendant E. Mishan & Sons (“EMS”) motion for summary judgment on plaintiff Hearthware’s copyright, Lanham Act and related state law

Copyright infringement claims do not guarantee preliminary injunction

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

Judge Dow denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent further alleged infringement of plaintiff’s photographs and denied defendant John Wiley & Sons’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s fraud claim

Discovery limited to avoid a fishing expedition

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 5 2013

Judge Keys granted in part defendant MBHB’s motion to compel document production and request for admission responses in this copyright case involving

Plaintiff may not dismiss claims in response to summary judgment motion

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 20 2014

Judge St. Eve, after previously deferring ruling to allow the parties to work out procedural disputes, granted defendant John Wiley & Sons’ motion

Alleged seeding of copyrighted material on BitTorrent is not copyright misuse

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

Judge Kennelly granted in part plaintiff Malibu Media’s motion to dismiss Doe defendant’s counterclaim and certain of its nineteen affirmative

Court allows joinder of BitTorrent Does for early stages of case - 27January, 2014

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2014

Judge Gottschall denied various Doe defendants’ motions to quash third party subpoenas to their respective internet service providers (ISPs) as well

Contract claims sound in copyright

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2011

Judge Kocoras denied defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and Rule 56 motion for summary judgment in this copyright and contract dispute involving photographs of Thomas & Friends characters - trains from the island of Sodor well-known to those like me with young children

Eye of the Tiger: Survivor survives motion to dismiss

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 7 2011

Judge Coleman denied counter-defendants' (collectively "Survivor Music") Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss counter-plaintiffs' breach of contract and related claims in this dispute over royalties due based upon the copyrighted songs of the band Survivor -- Eye of the Tiger was one of their big hits

Out-of-state lawyer avoids fine for failure to comply with local rules

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2011

Judge Shadur dismissed defendant Doe 300's motion to quash a subpoena in this copyright case, for numerous failures to comply with the Local Rules

Plaintiff need not attach copyright registration to complaint

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 27 2011

Judge Gottschall denied plaintiff Golden's motion to dismiss or for a more definite statement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) & (e) in this copyright dispute over real estate listings