We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 17

Defendant bears significant burden to rebut presumption of copyright validity

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2011

Highlighting the significant burden imposed upon a defendant who seeks to invalidate a plaintiff's copyright, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court’s sua sponte dismissal of a copyright infringement case, despite defendants offering multiple arguments towards the invalidity of the plaintiff’s copyright

Circuit split on whether copyright registration must be obtained before filing an infringement action

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2010

Copyright owners in the Ninth Circuit recently received same clarity concerning meeting the statutory prerequisites for filing copyright infringement actions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Challenge to grant of attorneys’ fees in copyright case derailed by untimely objection

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2011

Considering a plaintiff’s second motion for reconsideration challenging the award of attorneys’ fees to the defendant in a copyright case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld the award without remanding the issue to the district court where plaintiff’s objection was over 30 days late and defendant had submitted records demonstrating the reasonableness of the award

Copyright licensee must own at least one exclusive right for standing

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2011

Affirming dismissal of a copyright infringement suit brought by one licensee against another, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a plaintiff must show that it is the exclusive license of at least one of the divisible rights recognized under the Copyright Act to possess sufficient standing to sue for infringement

No standing if plaintiff’s exclusive rights were limited in time

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • India, USA
  • -
  • April 29 2011

Evaluating ownership of a sound recording under both the Indian Copyright Act and U.S. Copyright Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld a district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants in a copyright infringement action, finding that the plaintiff lacked standing to sue because the underlying agreement granted exclusive rights that were limited in time

“Situs of the injury” for exercising personal jurisdiction over defendant for online copyright infringement is location of copyright owner

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2011

In a decision favorable to copyright owners based in the state of New York, the New York State Court of Appeals held that in copyright infringement cases involving the uploading of copyrighted literary works onto the internet, the situs of the injury for purposes of determining personal jurisdiction under New York's long-arm jurisdiction statute is the location of the copyright holder and not the location of the infringing conduct

Second Circuit revives copyright infringement suit against non-resident for uploading copyrighted material online

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2011

Employing the standard set out by the New York Court of Appeals in internet copyright infringement cases, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has revived a copyright infringement suit brought by a New York resident against a non-resident based upon defendant’s alleged uploading of copyrighted materials onto the internet

eBay abrogates presumption of irreparable harm in copyright cases in Ninth Circuit

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2011

Considering the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2006 ruling in the patent infringement case eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. on copyright cases, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court held that irreparable harm may no longer be presumed upon showing a likelihood of success when seeking preliminary or permanent injunctive relief in copyright infringement cases

Ninth Circuit declares that “the king” is dead (in copyright cases)

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2011

Merely weeks after a separate panel considered the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2006 ruling in the patent infringement case eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. on copyright casesPerfect 10 Inc. v. Google Inc., Case No. 10-56316 (9th Cir., Aug. 3, 2011)the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit once again held that held that irreparable harm may no longer be presumed upon showing a likelihood of success when seeking preliminary or permanent injunctive relief in copyright infringement cases

Restoration of copyright in foreign works passes constitutional muster

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2012

A 1994 statute extended U.S. copyright protection to foreign works previously unprotected in the United States, removing an estimated “millions” of foreign works from free, public domain availability