We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 17

UMG Recordings Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2013

Ninth Circuit upholds DMCA safe harbor protection from copyright infringement liability for defendant video-sharing site Veoh, affirming grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor

Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Barrydriller Content Systems, plc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2013

California district court grants TV networks’ motion for preliminary injunction against internet streaming service, finding that, contrary to decisions by courts in the Second Circuit, streaming transmissions of copyrighted content likely infringed networks’ exclusive right to public performances

Viacom International v. Google Inc.,

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2013

On remand from the Second Circuit, district court grants summary judgment in favor of Google and its YouTube platform on all copyright infringement

Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. Hotfile Corp., et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2011

District court dismisses plaintiff motion picture companies’ claim for direct copyright infringement against defendant file-sharing site and its operator on defendants’ motion to dismiss, but allows plaintiffs’ claim for secondary infringement to stand against both corporate and individual defendants

Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v. WTV Systems, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 28 2011

District court grants plaintiff motion picture studios’ motion for preliminary injunction against operators of online video service, finding that plaintiffs had established likelihood of success on claims that service violated their exclusive rights to publicly perform their copyrighted works and caused irreparable harm, including loss of revenue and interference with licensing agreements

Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 20 2010

In a copyright infringement action, the court rejected the defendant’s request for a jury instruction that states “statutory damages must bear a reasonable relationship to the harm suffered by each plaintiff.”

Righthaven, LLC v. Majorwager.com, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 4 2010

In a copyright infringement action, court rejects defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding that plaintiff did not own the copyright at the time of the infringement

Arista Records LLC v. Lime Wire LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2010

Court enters a permanent injunction in a copyright infringement action brought by several record companies against Lime Wire, a provider of a peer-to-peer system used to download digital music files

Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2011

On May 11, 2010, the court granted summary judgment to plaintiff record companies on their claims against defendants for secondary copyright infringement

Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2011

New York’s highest court, answering a certified question from the Second Circuit, holds that in a copyright infringement action where a copyrighted literary work is uploaded to the Internet, for purposes of determining jurisdiction under New York’s long-arm statute, the situs of the injury is the copyright holder’s principal place of business