We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 148

U.K. jumps on “pay-to-delay” bandwagon

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • April 24 2013

The U.K. Office of Fair Trading ("OFT") jumped on the "pay-to-delay" bandwagon last week when it issued a "Statement of Objections," indicating a

Patents and Canadian competition laws

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

In Canada, the Competition Act largely defers to the Patent Act. For example, the Act's abuse of dominance provision (s. 79 Canada's

Generics demand brand drug samples for ANDA filings

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2013

Tensions between branded pharma companies and their generic competitors are boiling over into court battles over the "right" of generics to demand

A new front in the patent wars: CJEU asked for guidance on limits to injunctive relief

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • April 11 2013

The patent wars between large technology companies continue unabated. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is set to provide guidance on

Northern exposure?

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • April 4 2013

Davit Akman and John Norman suggest that a recently commenced investigation into alleged "product switching" and statements by the Interim

Supreme Court hears arguments on antitrust issues with "pay for delay" agreements

  • Schiff Hardin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2013

On March 25, 2013, the US Supreme Court heard arguments in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, a case that could have a huge impact on the health

Supreme Court hears arguments in FTC v. Actavis

  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2013

On March 25, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, a case involving a circuit split regarding "pay for

Supreme Court hears oral argument in pay-for-delay patent settlement antitrust case

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

The Supreme Court's ruling in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., will almost certainly have major implications for the viability of Federal

Supreme Court hears oral argument involving “reverse payment” patent infringement settlements

  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

After more than a decade of litigation in the lower courts, the Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in a case of considerable consequence to

Betting on the wrong market definition

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 8 2013

In IGT v. Alliance Gaming Corporation slot machine manufacturers, IGT and Alliance Gaming Corp., Bally Gaming International, Inc., and Bally

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy