We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 20

ALJ Gildea denies private parties’ joint motion to terminate investigation in Certain Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-797)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 30 2012

On November 27, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 73 in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-797

Google Wallet sued for patent infringement in Delaware

  • Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 23 2012

This afternoon, Google was sued over its Google Wallet smartphone application allegedly infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,298,271 (the ’271 patent) in the Federal District Court of Delaware

Commission affirms no violation finding as to four patents and remands to ALJ with respect to one patent in Inv. No. 337-TA-745

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2012

On August 24, 2012, the Commission issued a Notice of its decision to affirm the ALJ’s finding of no violation as to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,636,223 and 6,272,333 patents and to reverse the finding of violation as to U.S. Patent No. 6,246,697 in Inv. No. 337-TA-745, Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, Computers and Components Thereof, involving Complainant Motorola Mobility and Respondent Apple

Samsung ordered to pay $1 billion for violations of Apple patents

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2012

Apple won a sweeping legal victory last Friday as a California jury held Samsung, Inc. liable for a hefty $1 billion in damages for willfully infringing six mobile device patents held by Apple

ALJ Gildea rules on motions in limine in Certain Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-797)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2012

On August 17, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public versions of Order No. 60 (dated July 26, 2012), Order No. 62 (dated July 30, 2012), and Order No. 67 (dated August 2, 2012) regarding various motions in limine filed by Complainant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-797

Apple v. samsung: jury verdict

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2012

Apple obtained a $1.05 billion verdict in the Northern District of California

ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-853) regarding Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2012

On August 21, 2012, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a press release announcing their vote to institute an investigation of Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-8532

Google attempts to intervene at the ITC in an investigation initiated by Nokia against HTC

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 24 2012

Google moved to intervene as a respondent in the investigation brought by Nokia against HTC

ALJ Gildea rules on motions in limine in Certain Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-797)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2012

On August 17, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public versions of Order No. 61 (dated July 26, 2012), Order No. 65 (dated July 31, 2012), Order No. 66 (dated August 2, 2012) and Order No. 68 (dated August 2, 2012) in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-797

Apple v. Samsung: Samsung moves to preclude Apple from commenting on Samsung's failure to call certain witnesses at trial

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2012

As the patent trial between Samsung and Apple continues, Samsung moved to preclude Apple from either eliciting testimony or attorney comment on Samsung's failure to call certain witnesses to testify at trial

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy