We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-18 of 18

Litepanels files new 337 complaint

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2011

Litepanels, Ltd. and Litepanels Inc. (collectively “Litepanels”) filed a Complaint concerning Certain LED Photographic Lighting Devices and Components Thereof, which asserts five patents

Procedural schedule set in Inv. No. 337-TA-781

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 3 2011

On August 2, 2011, ALJ Bullock issued an order setting the procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-781, Certain Microprocessors, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same

ALJ issues final initial determination and recommends remedy in Inv. No. 337-TA-734

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 3 2011

ALJ Gildea issued a public version of his Initial Determination and Recommended Remedy in Inv. No. 337-TA-734, Certain Electronic Devices With Image Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software

Commission determines not to review ALJ's finding of no violation in 337-TA-717

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2011

On July 18, 2011, the Commission determined not to review ALJ Robert K

ALJ Luckern sets procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-774

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2011

On July 18, 2011, ALJ Luckern set a procedural schedule based on a proposed schedule jointly submitted by the parties in Certain Electronic Devices Having A Digital Television Receiver and Components Thereof, 337-TA-774

Commission grants consent motion to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-685

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 8 2011

On July 7, 2011, the Commission granted a consent motion filed by complainant, Samsung Electronics Co. (“Samsung”) in Inv. No. 337-TA-685, Certain Flash Memory and Products Containing Same, to terminate the investigation in its entirety on the basis of settlement

Federal Circuit issues opinion in Pass & Seymour v. ITC

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2010

On August 27, 2010 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the holding of the International Trade Commission in Inv. No. 337-TA-615, that certain accused products produced by Respondents General Protecht Group, Wenzhou Trimone Science and Technology Electric Co. Ltd. and Shanghai ELE Manufacturing Corporation do not infringe the asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 5,594,398 and 7,212,386, held by Complainant Pass & Seymour, Inc

ALJ Bullock denies summary determination motions in Inv. No. 337-TA-704

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2010

ALJ Bullock issued two orders denying summary determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-704, Certain Mobile Communication Devices and Components Thereof