We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 84

Apple ordered to pay $533m in iTunes patent infringement case

  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2015

A federal jury in Texas found that Apple's iTunes infringed three patents held by Smartflash LLC and awarded Smartflash over half a billion dollars

The Federal Circuit limits the use of the patent exhaustion defense to "authorized acquirers"

  • Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2015

On February 10, 2015, the Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit in Helferich Patent Licensing v. NY Times and JCPenneyreversed a district court

Wireless does not mean “without wires”; “streaming video” does not mean emailing a video file

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Reviewing a final written decision of U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), finding application claims unpatentable, the U.S. Court of

CAFC rules on patent exhaustion

  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 10 2015

The patents-in-suit are directed to sending text messages with a link to a website, and a user can click on the link to retrieve content from the

Internet activity claims are valid subject matter

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 26 2015

In DDR HOLDINGS, LLC v. HOTELS.COM, L.P., Appeal No. 2013-1505, the Federal Circuit held Internet-activity claims recited patentable subject matter

Software patent abstraction hits social media platforms

  • Ober Kaler
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2015

The process of creating “link relationships” between documents and personal profiles used by Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms

Avoiding PTAB sanctions just play by the rules

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Despite having the authority to sanction parties for misconduct (see 37 C.F.R. 42.12), until the Board’s decision in SAP America et al. V. Lakshmi

Post-Aliceclaims directed to an abstract idea must have meaningful limitations

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Addressing patent eligibility in a covered business method (CBM) patent review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Claims were patent-eligible where they solved a problem unique to the internet by requiring interactions that differed from routine internet usage

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 22 2014

Federal Circuit reverses a denial of JMOL of anticipation on one patent but affirms a judgment that second patent is eligible subject matter under

インターネット上のニュースグループへの投稿は刊行物に相当する

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 22 2014

Federal CircuitはSUFFOLK Technologies, LLC v. AOL Inc. (Appeal No. 13-1392) においてインターネット上のUsenetニュースグループへの投稿という形態の刊行物を根