We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 63

Online transaction claim held unpatentable

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 27 2014

In BUYSAFE, Inc. V. Google, Inc., Appeal No. 2013-1575, the Federal Circuit affirmed a judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. 101 for lack of

$368 million damages award vacated

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 27 2014

In VIRNETX, Inc. V. Cisco SYSTEMS, Inc., Appeal No. 2013-1489, the Federal Circuit vacated a damages award for use of an improper royalty base

PTAB grants request for rehearing relating to procedure for serving petitions

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In an order granting a request for rehearing to address the issue of a filing date of a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and

Court grants stay pending IPR to non-petitioner, conditioned on agreement to estoppel

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2014

In a further development in an area where numerous district court judges have issued divergent opinions, a court in the Northern District of

CAFC rules on issues of claim construction, infringement, evidence, and reasonably royalty determination

  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2014

The CAFC affirmed the district court’s construction of “domain name” as “a name corresponding to an IP address,” rejecting Appellant’s argument that

Federal Circuit frames test for patent-eligibility

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 8 2014

Personalized medicine relies on diagnostics to analyze a patient for individualized therapy and for monitoring a patient's health status. Some

Federal Circuit affirms invalidity under section 101 of patent claims directed to guaranteeing performance of online transactions

  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 3 2014

A claim that merely requires generic computer implementation of an abstract idea is not subject matter eligible under section 101. At issue were

Federal Circuit holds that internet search claims were invalid as obvious

  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2014

The asserted claims were directed to an internet search system that combines content-based and collaborative filtering. Content-based filtering

PTAB threatens sanctions for unauthorized e-mails

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Addressing a patent owner’s unauthorized e-mail arguing for additional discovery and the petitioner’s likewise unauthorized responsive e-mail, an

On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related