We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 55

Legislative outlook

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2013

On February 28, 2013, Sen. John "Jay" Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., Chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, introduced a bill called the "Do-Not-Track

CAFC finds that adapting well-known methods of doing business to the Internet is obvious as a matter of law

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2013

Sovereign brought a patent infringement suit against Newegg for infringement of certain claims in three U.S. patents, all relating to electronic

Function Media, LLC v. Google Inc., No. 2012-1020 (Fed. Cir. Feb 13, 2013)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2013

Special purpose computer-implemented means-plus-function limitations require the specification to disclose the algorithm for performing the function

Nothing non-obvious about applying pre-existing technology to the Internet

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2013

Addressing the issue of obviousness of patents directed to Internet-based software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a

"MOOCcs and consequences"

  • Dow Lohnes PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2013

Michael Goldstein and Matthew Rizzolo co-authored "MOOCs and Consequences" which was published in College Planning and Management Magazine. It should

What businesses need to know about the FTC’s settlement with Google

  • Jones Day
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2013

The Federal Trade Commission has announced a settlement with Google that secured limited changes to Google's practices, but brought no action against

Google search practices mostly OK’d, but patent practices must change

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 5 2013

The Federal Trade Commission announced that it found that Google did not violate anti-competition law by favoring its own products and services in some

Tips for drafting cloud method claims post-Akamai

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 27 2012

The number of cloud computing service offerings has risen dramatically over the past couple years

Chief Judge Kozinski rules in favor of Google finding Street View did not infringe Vederi's patents

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

Vederi owns several patents which cover certain methods for enabling users to navigate a geographic area visually from a device, including a personal computer

Judge Stark grants British Telecommunication's motion to amend complaint to add new alleged infringement claims against Google

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 29 2012

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P