We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 328

Understanding the fees associated with the options for challenging issues patents

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

While the fees for filing inter partes review (IPR) or post grant review (PGR) proceedings (including the transitional program for covered business

Coordinating a European opposition with an IPR or PGR

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

The America Invents Act creates two new methods for third parties to challenge issued patents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): inter

ITC podcast: Smith Brittingham and Mareesa Frederick on best practices for litigating at the ITC

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has become a key destination for both domestic and foreign intellectual property litigants. ITC cases

District court stays four cases pending PTAB review of CBM patents

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2013

Earlier today, Judge Pearson of the Northern District of Ohio stayed four co-pending district court cases involving patents subject to a number of

PTAB to broadcast first ever CBM oral hearing

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2013

On April 17, 2013, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) will hold its very first Oral Hearing for a Post Grant Review proceeding under the

Limits on discovery in IPRs: no fishing expeditions for information relating to infringement

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2013

Recent inter partes review (IPR) orders confirm that the scope of discovery in IPR is significantly narrower than the broad-ranging discovery

The impact of the effective filing date under the AIA

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 12 2013

The effective filing date of a claimed invention is a central concept relevant to several key provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA). It

Preissuance submission: what, who, when, and how

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2013

A third party, anonymously, may file any patents, published patent applications, or other printed publications of potential relevance to the

USPTO revises patent term adjustment (PTA) practice

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2013

On April 1, 2013, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued interim final rules amending several rules relating to patent term adjustment

The role of supplemental examination

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2013

A new procedure in the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ("AIA") allows a patent owner to request supplemental examination of a patent by the U.S

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy