Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Recent changes in US patent law impacting Taiwan companies

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
Taiwan, USA
-
June 12 2012

In this high-tech era, competition among companies often involve IP strategies, including high-stakes patent litigation

Q&A regarding U.S. IP law

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
November 24 2011

A utility patent application can be filed at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) either as a provisional application or a non-provisional application

Looking ahead

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
July 26 2011

On June 27, 2011, the Supreme Court granted review in both Hyatt v. Kappos, 625 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (en banc), and Novo Nordisk AS v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., 601 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2010

Spotlight info - May 2011

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 23 2011

In TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp., No. 09-1374 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2011) (en banc), the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, overruled the two-step analysis from KSM Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Co., 776 F.2d 1522 (Fed. Cir. 1985), governing the standards for contempt proceedings in patent infringement cases

Looking ahead - May 2011

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
-
USA
-
May 23 2011

Late last year, in Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., 629 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2010), the Federal Circuit affirmed a finding of no joint infringement, holding that Akamai Technologies, Inc. did not show that Limelight Networks, Inc.’s (“Limelight”) customers were acting as agents of Limelight when performing the steps of the claim that Limelight itself did not perform

Search results

Recent changes in US patent law impacting Taiwan companies

Q&A regarding U.S. IP law

Looking ahead

Spotlight info - May 2011

Looking ahead - May 2011

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Workarea