We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 497

Fujitsu v. Tellabs: Fujitsu appeal's decision on motion to compel and, after it loses on appeal, district court orders a civil penalty which doubles each day documents are not produced

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

In this patent infringement action, the district court granted a motion to compel filed by Tellabs against Fujitsu. Fujitsu then filed a petition for

Inducing infringement claim dismissed on sua sponte order where alleged infringer did not perform all method steps and did not exercise direction and control

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2014

In this patent infringement action, the district court issued a sua sponte order requiring plaintiff to show why its inducing infringement claims

The PTAB finds that the petitioner did not show that a patent claiming internet-based transactions is not a technological invention and denied CBM review on that basis

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 9 2014

In GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. Lakshmi Arunachalam, GSI filed a petition seeking covered business method patent review of U.S. Patent No. 8,346

Motion to strike expert testimony denied even though expert had never used product and examined only selected pieces of source code

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 8 2014

In this patent infringement action, the defendant moved to exclude portions of the plaintiff's (Dr. Bambos') expert testimony. Defendant argued that

PTAB - Ford is not barred from challenging a patent on a hybrid vehicle based on the unproven assertion that it breached an agreement not to challenge the patent

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2014

In Ford Motor Company v. Paice LLC & The Abell Foundation, Inc., Ford filed a petition seeking inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,214,097

Court denies motion to compel deposition testimony on overly broad 30(b)(6) topics and on "contention" topics

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2014

In this patent infringement action brought by Trustees of Boston University ("BU"), BU alleged that defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,686,738

PTAB - Trulia and Zillow possible merger is not a sufficient basis for extending the 12 month period to complete the trial

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 2 2014

In Trulia, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc., Trulia filed a petition seeking covered business method review of U.S. Patent No. 7,970,674 relating to

Laches defense denied where Texas Instruments failed to produce products that demonstrated notice during discovery and Texas Instruments failed to make showing of economic prejudice

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

At the end of trial, the Defendant, Texas Instruments Incorporated's ("TI"), pursued its equitable defense of laches, the only remaining issue left

The PTAB rejects Microsoft's attempt to institute an IPR proceeding almost 7 years after being served with a complaint involving the patent-at-issue

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2014

In Microsoft Corporation v. Virnetx Inc., Microsoft filed a petition seeking inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180 ("the '180 patent") on

District court grants motion to dismiss for lack of standing where plaintiff did not provide evidence that it owned the patent at the time of filing the complaint

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 29 2014

Juno Lighting, LLC ("Juno") filed a complaint against Nora Lighting, Inc. ("Nora") on February 11, 2013. The complaint alleged that Nora infringed