We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 337

Counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity dismissed as duplicative of infringement complaint and failure to plead any facts describing how the patent was invalid

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

Plaintiff, The Sliding Door Company ("Sliding Door"), brought an action for patent infringement against KLS Doors, LLC ("KLS Doors") alleging

Stay pending inter partes review denied because defendant waited too long to file the petition and court had dedicated resources to determining claim construction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

Defendant Universal Remote Control, Inc. ("Universal Remote") filed a motion to stay a patent infringement action filed by Universal Electronics, Inc

Assignment agreement that failed to specifically address right to sue for past damages held insufficient on summary judgment; summary judgment granted to limit damages to period after patent was acquired

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

Plaintiff Nano-Second Technology filed a patent infringement action against Dynaflex International, GForce Corporation, dba DFX Sports & Fitness

Community property rights of ex-wife impact standing of plaintiff to maintain patent infringement action

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

James R. Taylor ("Taylor") filed a patent infringement action against Taylor Made Inc. ("Taylor Made"). Taylor Made filed a motion to dismiss the

Administrative law judge at ITC grants motion for leave to file motions for summary determination out of time because complainant did not provide additional support for infringement contentions in expert report

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

In this ITC proceeding, the Respondents filed a motion for leave to file motions for summary determination after the deadline for filing motions for

$50 million jury verdict over turned where plaintiff based damage theory on worldwide sales of accused products but only established that "some" of worldwide sales were infringing

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

Promega Corporation ("Promega") filed a patent infringement action against Life Technologies Corporation ("Life Technologies"), among others, over

Apple moves to limit claims asserted and court orders the plaintiff to reduce 247 claims to 70 claims over 10 patents

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 24 2013

Plaintiff Unwired Planet ("UP") filed a patent infringement action against Apple asserting over 247 claims in ten different patents. Apple filed a

Micron sends email to professors at the University of Illinois stating that Micron would withhold funding from the University because it remained a defendant in a patent infringement action brought by the University

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

The University of Illinois filed a patent infringement action against Micron Technology. During the litigation, Micron sent an email to a number of

Allegation that defendants knew of patent at time of service of complaint sufficient to establish knowledge requirement for inducing infringement

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2013

Potter Voice filed a patent infringement action against Apple, Google, HTC, Sony, LG, Motorola, ZTE, Kyocera, Sharp, Huawei, Pantech, Research in

Motorola v. Apple: judge postpones Markman and orders Motorola and Apple to clean up their own mess

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2013

As the litigation between Motorola and Apple rages on throughout the country, one judge has had enough of an ever increasing number of claims and