We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 504

District court denies Daubert motion based on VirnetX as exceeding the district court's role as gatekeeper

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

In this patent infringement action, Adobe filed a Daubert motion seeking to exclude the plaintiff's damage expert largely based on VirnetX, Inc. v

Controlling, or having the ability to control, the preparation of a petition leads to a finding that the non-party is a real party-in-interest and that the petition is time barred

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 28 2014

In IPR proceeding First Data Corporation v. Cardsoft (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC, the petitioner, First Data Corporation

The PTAB authorizes the patent owner to file its motion for leave to take discovery of general electric on possible privity with a customer-defendant

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 23 2014

In General Electric Co. v. Transdata, Inc., the patent owner requested authorization to file a motion for leave to take discovery of petitioner

District court precludes admission of inter partes review proceedings in front of jury but permits consideration as part of willfulness determination

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 22 2014

In this patent infringement action between Ultratec, Inc. ("Ultratec") and Sorenson Communications, Inc. ("Sorenson"), Sorenson sought to admit

PTAB requires the patent owner to attend oral argument

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 21 2014

In Butamax Advanced Biofuels, LLC v. Gevo, Inc., the patent owner requested permission to be excused from the oral hearing. The patent owner cited

The PTAB warns attorney that speaking objections may warrant exclusion of expert's testimony

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 17 2014

In an inter partes review Medtronic Inc. et al. V. Troy R. Norred, M.D., the Petitioner sought guidance from the Board regarding the Patent Owner's

E.D. Texas court grants stay of litigation pending an IPR based, in part, on patent owner's failure to timely respond to the stay motion

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2014

In Norman IP Holdings v. TP-Link Technologies, Co., et al., the Defendants moved to stay the litigation pending completion of an inter partes review

Fujitsu v. Tellabs: Fujitsu appeal's decision on motion to compel and, after it loses on appeal, district court orders a civil penalty which doubles each day documents are not produced

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

In this patent infringement action, the district court granted a motion to compel filed by Tellabs against Fujitsu. Fujitsu then filed a petition for

Inducing infringement claim dismissed on sua sponte order where alleged infringer did not perform all method steps and did not exercise direction and control

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2014

In this patent infringement action, the district court issued a sua sponte order requiring plaintiff to show why its inducing infringement claims

The PTAB finds that the petitioner did not show that a patent claiming internet-based transactions is not a technological invention and denied CBM review on that basis

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 9 2014

In GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. Lakshmi Arunachalam, GSI filed a petition seeking covered business method patent review of U.S. Patent No. 8,346