We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 514

Motion to reconsider Claim Construction Order on indefiniteness after Nautilus denied where district court found term definite

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 17 2014

Defendant Stealth Cam, LLC ("Stealth Cam") requested that the district court reconsider its Claim Construction Order holding that the term "extending

Motorola : inventor's ex-spouse's co-owns the patent-in-suit

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 13 2014

In the matter pending in the Western District of Texas, Katrinecz, et al. V. Motorola Mobility LLC, Motorola moved to dismiss the complaint for lack

Defendant ordered to provide access to licensee websites

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 12 2014

BNB Health Grades, Inc. ("Health Grades") filed a patent infringement action against MDx Medical, Inc., dba Vitals.com ("MDx"). During the

Apple motion to stay litigation pending an IPR is denied by the district court for the Northern District of California

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 11 2014

In the matter pending in the Northern District of California, Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., Apple moved to stay the litigation pending inter

Production of billing statements from law firm denied even though deponent could not recall details of why information was not disclosed to PTO

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2014

The defendants in this patent infringement action sought the production of certain billing statements of the law firm representing CleanTech. The

District Court precludes deposition of in-house counsel who acted as part of trial team even though counsel had relevant, non-privileged conversations regarding indemnity

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

After plaintiff, McAirlaids, requested the deposition of one of Kimberly-Clark's ("K-C") in-house litigation counsel, K-C filed a motion for a

The future of inducing infringement claims after Limelight v. Akamai

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

In Limelight v. Akamai, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's precedent holding that inducing infringement claims did not

PTAB: claims for method of authenticating a website are patentable under Alice and Section 101

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 4 2014

In a CBM petition filed by petitioners PNC Bank, U.S. Bank, and Bancorp, the petitioners sought review of U.S. Patent No. 7,631,191, which claims a

District court denies motion to file amended complaint to add direct infringement claim

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 3 2014

Plaintiff Kaneka Corporation ("Plaintiff") filed a patent infringement against SKC Kolon PI, Inc. ("SKPI" or "Defendant") and SKC, Inc. ("SKC

Reliance on the same prior art dooms Medtronic's attempt to correct its previously rejected IPR petition

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2014

In IPR proceeding involving Medtronic, Inc. v. NuVasive. Inc., the petitioner, Medtronic, file a petition seeking review of U.S. Patent No. 8,361,156