We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 615

New Scheduling Order may preview future Delaware “local patent rules”

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2014

On March 24, 2014, Judge Sue L. Robinson of the District of Delaware adopted a new model Scheduling Order for patent cases litigated in her court

A first look at the USPTO 101 training slides

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2014

The USPTO has set up a new web page with resources for examining claims for patent subject matter eligibility, including a link to the slides used in

USPTO eases requirements for Track I prioritized examination

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 20 2014

In a Federal Register Notice issued March 5, 2014, the USPTO announced interim rules under the Track I prioritized examination program that ease the

USPTO releases examiner post-”Myriad” training slides points to ponder

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 20 2014

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published its examiner training materials (Training Materials) for applying "2014 Procedures

District court doubts patent eligbility of Myriad BRCA claims

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2014

In a decision issued March 10, 2014, Judge Shelby of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah denied Myriad's motion for a preliminary

District Judge Payne holds that form 18’s “talismanic” pleading is superseded by IqbalTwombly

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 17 2014

In a March 10, 2014 opinion in Macronix Int'l Co. v. Spansion Inc., District Judge Robert E. Payne held that the sufficiency of patent infringement

Five things you should know about the USPTO patent subject matter eligibility guidelines

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2014

The new USPTO patent subject matter eligibility guidelines set forth a detailed analytical framework for evaluating whether claims satisfy the patent

Pre-issuance conduct may support declaratory judgment jurisdiction

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2014

In this case, the parties (or their predecessors) had been litigating other patent disputes since as early as 2001. The instant dispute centered

Trade secret vs. patent protection: consider FOIA or public records requests

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2014

With patents coming under increasing scrutiny at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") in conjunction with changes to the patent laws brought

Federal Circuit finds easy solution to Avodart solvate written description question

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2014

Are claims that recite a "solvate" of a chemical compound invalid for lack of written description if the patent does not describe any specific