We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,018

Deposition of declarants is limited after routine discovery

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

In an Order on Conduct of the Proceedings, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) denied a patent

Reissue patents must be drawn to the same invention as the original patent

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Addressing the original-patent requirement, tracing vintage Supreme Court cases and interpreting the statutory purpose of 35 U.S.C. 251, the U.S

Navigating degrees of separation: impermissible incorporation by reference

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Following a conference call held with respect to three separate proceedings presenting an identical issue, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s

Pro se not welcome at PTAB

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Denying a request from patent owner’s counsel to withdraw from an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and

Get your prior art ducks in a row before filing your inter partes review petition

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

In two recent decisions demonstrating that amending a petition for inter partes review (IPR) with supplemental information can be difficult, the U.S

Patent owner must distinguish universe of all known prior art to substitute a new claim

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Detailing the requirements for amending claims in an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Patent owner without control of licensee has no standing to sue

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Applying patent licensor-licensee standing law to defendants’ motion to dismiss a plaintiff, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling

Collateral estoppel in claim construction

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Addressing the issue of collateral estoppel as it relates to an earlier claim construction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Person of skill in art depends on claim scope

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) has explained that arguing a high-level of skill in a narrow art, even in cases involving complex

PTAB issues rare dissent in non-institution decision

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

In a decision denying institution of an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB or