We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 911

Federal Circuit rejects writ of mandamus concerning waiver of argument

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

In a brief order, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a writ of mandamus filed by Nokia Corporation seeking to compel the U.S

The importance of the one-year AIA timeline

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Addressing the one-year time frame for completing Inter Partes Review (IPR) in the context of a stay request, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s

Federal Circuit reverses ITC violation of its own rules

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a ruling by the International Trade Commission (ITC, the Commission), finding that, under

Failure of appellant to appeal damages award precludes district court to reconsider damages after partial reversal

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s denial of a motion to modify a damages award following the partially

Kappos v. Hyatt applies broadly to raising new issues in district court actions

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Addressing the scope of permissible new issues and evidence admissible in 35 U.S.C. 146 district court proceedings, the U.S. Court of Appeals for

Inherency is tough to proveeven in IPR

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

In four final written decisions in Inter Partes Review (IPR) challenges, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) concluded that the petitioner had

Assignor estoppel and motion to amend claims both tough sells in inter partes review

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Addressing a patent owner’s request to dismiss an Inter Partes Review (IPR) based on assignor estoppel and motion to amend the claims, the U. S

First application of Alice Corp. decision to covered business method patent review

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

In determining whether a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review should be instituted, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) referred to the

Characterization as “essential element” amounts to a disavowal of scope

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Addressing the impact of an alleged disclaimer made in a patent on which asserted patents relied for priority, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Patentee owner must show a nexus between alleged commercial success and the claimed technology

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Addressing the issue of whether secondary considerations for non-obviousness showing commercial success of a system allegedly infringing a patent