We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 939

Inter partes review not stayed, despite looming patent ownership trial

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

Addressing a motion to stay an Inter Partes Review (IPR) by the patent owner, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board

PTAB grants request for rehearing relating to procedure for serving petitions

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In an order granting a request for rehearing to address the issue of a filing date of a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and

Post-Therasense IC alive and kicking at the Federal Circuit

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

After finding that a patent owner had made several misrepresentations to the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) during prosecution, the U.S. Court of

Expungement of unauthorized filings under 37 CFR 42.7(a)

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In a sua sponte order concerning an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Petitioner barred from raising arguments not in petition

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

Addressing the petitioner’s request for rehearing of a denial for review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB

Know the patent specification before filing a motion to amend

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

Addressing issues of claim construction and the requirements for a motion to amend, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal

The narrow scope of supplemental discovery in an inter partes review

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

Addressing issues of limited discovery and the requirements of a motion for supplemental discovery, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied

Movants face a high bar to succeed on motions to amend

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In response to a patent owner’s motion to amend its claims in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO

The doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting maintains its vitality

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

Addressing whether the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting is still viable, and, if so, whether it served to invalidate a later-issued and

Broad language in specification can provide written description support

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In reviving a patent owner’s patent infringement lawsuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s summary