We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,073

DOJ issues business review letter pertaining to SSO policy on standard-essential patents and RAND commitments

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

The Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a business review letter stating that it would not challenge the Institute of

Untimely presentation of updated Mandatory Notice is not a cause for termination

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Addressing a petitioner’s untimely Updated Mandatory Notice following a merger, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal

Expert witness testimony normally improper for Preliminary Response

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Clarifying what is impermissible "new" evidence for a Patent Owner Preliminary Response in an Inter Partes Review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal

Failure to name all real parties in interest may cause termination of a proceeding after institution

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Addressing the issue of identification of all real-parties-in interest in a petition, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO’s) Patent Trial and

Federal Circuit affirms PTAB’s lack of patentability ruling in first-ever AIA review

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Addressing for the first time an appeal of an America Invents Act review decision out of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO's) Patent Trial

You can’t win if you don’t play

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

In two related final written decisions, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) invalidated numerous

PTAB is unimpressed by over-lawyering

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Addressing a patent owner’s objections to demonstrative exhibits, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO’s) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB

No early peek of cross-examination documents

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Addressing patent owner’s challenge to the accuracy of the translation of a foreign language reference that was relied upon in a petition for covered

Would have been obvious to combine prior art that mentions an object with standard textbook that describes that object

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

Addressing the merits in an inter partes review of a patent for improved computer graphics calculations, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent

No exception for energy management patentCBM review instituted

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

In its decision to institute a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review of an energy management patent, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s