Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 246
Common patentee missteps in inter partes review
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 14 2013
The new post grant patentability challenges of the America Invents Act (AIA) have been warmly embraced by the public as a cost effective patent
Post Markman IPR filing displeases court
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 10 2013
The primary business distinctions between the USPTO Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings and traditional court based patent invalidity
Should you request a rehearing of your PTAB trial order?
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 16 2013
As detailed earlier this week, a patentee's decision to file a preliminary response in an IPRCBM preliminary proceeding is not as straightforward as
E-commerce & software patent trolls targeted by Congress
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 8 2013
As I pointed out last week, Congress is considering fixes to the U.S patent system are designed to combat the patent troll problem. Yesterday, S.866
Is it malpractice to file a declaratory judgment of invalidity after the AIA?
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 26 2013
The face of patent litigation in the U.S. was forever changed on September 16, 2012. This was the date the post grant patentability trials of the
Patentee seeks injunction against USPTO to stop IPR proceeding
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 7 2013
Every time Congress has tasked the USPTO with conducting a new post grant patent proceeding the agency finds itself fending off legal challenges to
After final rejection pilot program revamped by USPTO
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 21 2013
Some pre- grant news of note this week. Last Friday the USPTO announced the After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0 (Federal Register Notice here
Limited PTAB discovery frustrates district court litigators
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 1 2013
Parties to an Inter Parties Review (IPR) proceeding may obtain “limited discovery” at the USPTO’s Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB). Such discovery
Stays pending USPTO review to increase as a result of speedier AIA options
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 29 2013
The primary business distinctions between the USPTO Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings and traditional court based patent invalidity
NPEs unwittingly invite lopsided battles at PTAB
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 10 2013
As the new patentability trials of the America Invents Act (AIA) have only been available for 7 months their impact is only now beginning to be felt
