Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 211

Customer suit exception as a patent troll solution

Santa Clara Law Professor Brian Love and Wilson Sonsini partner James Yoon have written a thought-provoking article (slated for publication in the

Lefkow granted in part plaintiff CBOE’s motion to strike defendant ISE’s expert witness in this patent case, as follows: This case was not governed

Santa Clara Law Professor Colleen Chien recently wrote an interesting article on Patently-O discussing some key patent troll statistics in light of

Judge Lefkow considered defendant ISE’s arguments that the Court’s construction of “means for matching” was incomplete because it did not define an

Judge Lefkow granted defendant ISE’s motion to exclude plaintiff CBOE’s evidence of non-infringing alternatives from the lost profits analysis in

Judge Kennelly denied defendants U Lighting America and its sole officer and employee’s (collectively “ULA”) motion to dismiss this patent suit for

Judge Lefkow granted in part plaintiff CBOE’s motion in limine to exclude defendant ISE from introducing evidence of secondary consideration of

Eclipse IP, LLC v. Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc, (C.D. Cal.) (multiple cases). Judge: Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato Claim:

Judge Lefkow granted plaintiff CBOE’s motion in limine limiting defendant ISE’s expert testimony consistent with prior rulings regarding the scope of

Judge Lefkow granted in part CBOE’s motion in limine to limit ISE’s infringement argument at trial in this patent case. The issue for trial was