Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-3 of 3
Respondent's motion to compel based on declaration from a former employee that complainant's counsel were in contact with current employees of respondent was denied where complainant's counsel represented to ALJ that no such contact had occurred
- Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 17 2012
Respondent ClearCorrect Pakistan (Private) Ltd. ("CCPL") moved to compel complainant Align Technology, Inc. ("Align") to produce documents and supplement responses to interrogatories
Watch the language of your consulting agreements -- Federal Circuit holds that consulting agreement did not convey rights to inventions made during consulting term
- Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 29 2012
Abbott Point of Care Inc. ("Abbott") filed a complaint against Epocal, Inc. ("Epocal") alleging that it owned two patents and that Epocal infringed the two patents
Protecting ownership of your intellectual property: the importance of employment agreements
- Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 27 2010
A recent decision from the Federal Circuit Court of Appeal, Stanford University v. Roche, 583 F.3d 832 (Fed. Cir. 2009), highlights the importance of employment agreements in protecting the ownership of intellectual property
Current Search
- Jurisdiction - USA
- Workarea - Patents
- Workarea - Employment & Labor
- Author - Stanley M. Gibson