We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Organic farmers fail to show controversy, patent invalidation suit against Monsanto dismissed

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 2 2012

A federal court in New York has dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, the claims filed by numerous organic farming interests seeking a declaration that they are not infringing Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) seed patents, the patents are invalid and unenforceable and the company would not be entitled to remedies against them

Monsanto Co. wins patent infringement claims against GE soybean farmer

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2011

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that farmers who plant the progeny of genetically engineered (GE) soybean seeds protected by U.S. patents have infringed those patents even where the progeny are derived from commodity seed purchased from a grain elevator

Market study highlights key algae biofuel, biochemical success traits

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2011

Emerging Markets Online recently released an algae study that "highlights why some algae companies will be winners and some will be losers bringing their product from pilot to commercial scale from 2011-2020.”

Farmers and seed companies ask court to declare Monsanto GE seed patents invalid

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2011

A coalition of more than 50 trade organizations, seed businesses, farms, and farmers has filed a lawsuit in a federal court in New York, to stop Monsanto Co. from enforcing its genetically engineered (GE) seed patents against farmers whose fields become contaminated with the GE seeds